Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
What do you think about adding fib support for rc.subr like we got one
for nice?
There are PRs with patches for rc.subr for a long time without attention.
Same as with PR's adding suport for cpuset.
I don't understand why we are having some really useful tools in base
Hi,
What do you think about adding fib support for rc.subr like we got one
for nice?
On 04.02.2012 22:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
multiple FIBs i
On 04.02.2012 21:05, Hiroki Sato wrote:
"Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote
in<4f2dc674.4070...@freebsd.org>:
me> On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
me> > Hello,
me> >
me> >Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
me> >to route(8)? This should simp
"Alexander V. Chernikov" wrote
in <4f2dc674.4070...@freebsd.org>:
me> On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
me> > Hello,
me> >
me> > Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
me> > to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
me> > mul
On 04.02.2012 18:35, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the
following will do the trick without cha
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 03:35:32AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
> to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
> multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the
> following
Hello,
Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option
to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across
multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the
following will do the trick without changing rc.d/routing:
static_routes="foo bar"
