https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||mfc-stable12+
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #11 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: shurd
Date: Mon Nov 12 16:08:14 UTC 2018
New revision: 340365
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/340365
Log:
MFC r340236:
Fix rxcsum is
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Stephen Hurd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: shurd
Date: Wed Nov 7 19:31:49 UTC 2018
New revision: 340236
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/340236
Log:
Fix rxcsum issue introduced i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org
--
You are re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Stephen Hurd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|n...@freebsd.org |sh...@freebsd.org
Stat
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #9 from Stephen Hurd ---
The issue should be fixed by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17881
r338838 attempted to fix issues with rxcsum and rxcsum6.
However, the rxcsum bits were set as though if_setcapenablebit() was
being called
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #8 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Jeff Pieper from comment #7)
Yes, I understand this.
I hope to have feature parity between old and new at least :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Jeff Pieper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com
--- Comme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #6 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
And 11.2 doesn't cycle interface down/up :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #5 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
I've checked 11.2-RELEASE on exactly same system (booted it from 11.2
installation media) and 11.2 doesn't have this problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #4 from Stephen Hurd ---
Never mind, I see it. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lis
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Hurd ---
Does -rxcsum6 disable both rxcsum and rxcsum6 by any chance? Or does it also
have no effect?
I should have my system with an ix in it up in a couple hours, so I should be
able to test/fix this tonight.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #2 from Lev A. Serebryakov ---
(In reply to Stephen Hurd from comment #1)
Nothing changes:
root@:/tmp # ifconfig ix0
ix0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
options=e53fbb
ether 90:e2:ba:a3:c0:90
inet 192.168.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
--- Comment #1 from Stephen Hurd ---
What options are set by on that card when you try disabling rxcsum? Does the
link go down then back up when failing to disable rxcsum?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233004
Lev A. Serebryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|n...@freebsd.org
--
You are
16 matches
Mail list logo
