[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|Closed Resolution|---

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Krzysztof Galazka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krzysztof.gala...@intel.com --

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added CC||freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |e...@freebsd.org -- You are rec

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 --- Comment #17 from Eugene Grosbein --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #16) Our if_bridge(4) implementation uses promiscuous mode, so fixing multicast promiscuous setting should be enough without growing of multicast filtering list

[Bug 224116] [ixl] STP Frames are ignored in promiscuous mode

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224116 Eugene Grosbein changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|STP Frames are ignored |[ixl] STP Frames are