[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-03-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |asom...@freebsd.org Stat

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-02-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #18 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Wed Mar 1 00:28:04 UTC 2017 New revision: 314442 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/314442 Log: Add an ATF test for IPv6 SL

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-02-07 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #17 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Tue Feb 7 17:40:59 UTC 2017 New revision: 313395 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313395 Log: Add fibs_test:udp_dontroute

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-02-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #16 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- I've created a diff in Phabricator: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9451 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-01-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #15 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Tue Jan 31 20:13:50 UTC 2017 New revision: 313025 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313025 Log: Add tests for multi-fib IPv

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-01-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #14 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- (In reply to Alan Somers from comment #13) Hi Alan, Sorry for the radio silence - I can fix the test case and submit for formal code review in the next couple of days if you'd like. -- Yo

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2017-01-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #13 from Alan Somers --- I've fully reviewed jhujhiti's testcases. Apart from using the wrong syntax to delete an IPv6 route in same_ip_multiple_ifaces_inet6, it looks good. I'll commit it with minor changes. -- You are rece

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2016-12-29 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #12 from Alan Somers --- (In reply to jhujhiti from comment #11) Regarding same_ip_multiple_ifaces_fib0, the configuration isn't valid. But that's not the point of the test. As the comment and the PR say, the point of the test

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2016-12-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #11 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- Created attachment 178370 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=178370&action=edit inet6 test cases (In reply to Alan Somers from comment #10) Hi Alan, Here are the tes

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2016-12-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 Alan Somers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asom...@freebsd.org --- Comment #10

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2016-12-21 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #9 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- Created attachment 178192 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=178192&action=edit Respect net.add_addr_allfibs=0 for inet6 (revision 1) I didn't forget about this! I impl

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2015-10-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #8 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- (In reply to Alexander V. Chernikov from comment #7) I chose 10.2 since it's of immediate utility for me (this prevents me from deploying IPv6 at home, and I don't run HEAD on these machines).

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2015-10-31 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #7 from Alexander V. Chernikov --- (In reply to jhujhiti from comment #6) FreeBSD development model assumes all new features goes to HEAD first and, after some period of testing, are merged to stable branches if possible. So, it

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2015-10-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 --- Comment #6 from jhujh...@adjectivism.org --- It's a bit more complex than that. I think we also need to install link-local multicast routes in the correct FIB for each interface. I'm working on a patch against 10.2, but this is my first

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2015-10-30 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 Alexander V. Chernikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||melif...@freebsd.org ---

[Bug 196361] Constrain IPv6 routes to each FIB (Consistent with IPv4 route behaviour)

2015-10-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196361 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-patch, needs-qa S