[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second (signed integer limit)

2020-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 Dani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.d...@outlook.com --- Comment #12 from Dan

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second (signed integer limit)

2020-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 Kubilay Kocak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@freebsd.org Versio

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2019-10-22 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #10 from Andriy Gapon --- This problem with dummynet still exists. Here is a recent mailing list discussion with some ideas: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a1c0ac18-1290-a109-1c46-c8d6047cd8c1 -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2018-05-28 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 Eitan Adler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|In Progress |Open --- Comment #9 from Eitan Adler

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #8 from b...@boba.name --- > By that i mean the following: > First of all change the internals of dummynet to opportunistically > check the timer whenever there is traffic, rather than relying on > a one-tick granularity. When du

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #7 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to rizzo from comment #6) > (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #5) > > (In reply to boba from comment #4) > > > (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #2) > > > > (In reply to b

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 ri...@iet.unipi.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ri...@iet.unipi.it --- Comment

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #5 from Hiren Panchasara --- (In reply to boba from comment #4) > (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #2) > > (In reply to boba from comment #0) > > > It's impossible to create "pipe" with bandwidth higher than 2Gbits per

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-24 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #4 from b...@boba.name --- (In reply to Hiren Panchasara from comment #2) > (In reply to boba from comment #0) > > It's impossible to create "pipe" with bandwidth higher than 2Gbits per > > second. Possible due to "signed" type o

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 --- Comment #3 from b...@boba.name --- How can we be sure this change to "unsigned" type does not brake anything else ? There might be some other places in dummynet code where this variable may be used as "signed". Unfortunately my C skills

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-20 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 Hiren Panchasara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Needs Triage|In Discussion C

[Bug 194453] [dummynet] pipe config bw parameter is limited to 2Gbits per second

2014-10-19 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194453 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment