Re: [ANALISYS] Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> > Should I fill the PR? > You're rather supposed to submit a working patch. ;) OTOH, I'd rather wait and see how much time will it take for http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/51927 to be commited or carped. That another multicast problem is much simplier and PR contains a patch now.

Re: [ANALISYS] Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:16:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Should I fill the PR? > > > You're rather supposed to submit a working patch. ;) I'm afraid I do not have enough knowledge :-( Eugene ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.

Re: [ANALISYS] Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-20 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:00:52PM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: [...] > 3. Now we enter ip_output() keeping imo as one of arguments. >There we run the following code: > > else if (IN_MULTICAST(ntohl(ip->ip_dst.s_addr)) && > imo != NULL && imo->imo_multicast_ifp != NULL) { >

[ANALISYS] Re: multicast arp entry

2004-05-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:51:34PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > got message of size 236 on Tue May 18 16:42:26 2004 > > RTM_ADD: Add Route: len 236, pid: 0, seq 0, errno 0, > > flags: > > locks: inits: > > sockaddrs: > > 224.0.0.9 1.0.5e.0.0.9 em3:0.7.e9.1f.f1.de 172.20.2.75 > > > > After