MUT of stf (Re: (KAME-snap 8815) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE)

2004-10-19 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
Forgot to respond to this point: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST), > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Speaking of 6to4, if_stf.c does not support setting the MTU, because > there's no ioctl handler for it. It wouldn't IMHO hurt to be able to > raise it from the glued-

Re: (KAME-snap 8815) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-29 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST), > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Okay. Now I think I figure out the problem. Those host routes were >> created not deliberately, so the kernel will eventually need a fix to >> this. >> >> But if you are in a hurry and/or cannot re

Re: (KAME-snap 8815) Re: Weird memory exhaustion with FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE

2004-09-29 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:32 +0300 (EEST), > Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Okay. Now I think I figure out the problem. Those host routes were >> created not deliberately, so the kernel will eventually need a fix to >> this. >> >> But if you are in a hurry and/or cannot re