>Yoshi,
>I have attached a patch. Let me know if this fixes the problem.
>
>jayanth
>
Jayanth,
thanks for the patch. I tested with it, and the system performs nicely.
I appreciate your help.
Yoshi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of th
> This issue is a combination of mbuf cluster size and the
> TF_MORETOCOME flag.
> if (len) {
> if (len == tp->t_maxseg)
> goto send;
> if (!(tp->t_flags & TF_MORETOCOME) &&
>
> > >
> > > I tried to say that it had no effect between FreeBSD4.3 and Solaris,
>on my
> > > problem. That's what I did previously.
> > >
> > > I found discussion on "delayed ack problem"(January 24 and 25) in
>this
> > > m
> >
> > I tried to say that it had no effect between FreeBSD4.3 and Solaris, on my
> > problem. That's what I did previously.
> >
> > I found discussion on "delayed ack problem"(January 24 and 25) in this
> > mailing list. Though still do not understand why del
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Tsuchiya Yoshihiro wrote:
>
> > Mike Silbersack wrote:
> >
> > >Try disabling delayed ACKs and see how that affects your results. The
> > >default delay for delayed acks is 100ms.
> > >
&g
Mike Silbersack wrote:
>On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>and we changed the size from 1 to 1 byte and measured the time of
>>read/write pair on the server. Usually the measured time is
>>around or less than 1 msec, however it is always 100msec when the size is
>>between 2049
. Between two Solaris 8 machines, it did not happened.
Is this a known problem? or I am doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Yoshi
---
Yoshihiro Tsuchiya
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message