sage is an attempt to
> uncover any existing work on TFO for FreeBSD, as the existence of such work
> may change my plans.
>
> Copying Sara Dickinson and Tom Jones due to this thread:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2015-January/040910.html
> <https://lists.free
, IPv6 server support is
in 3.16. I am trying to find out if TFO is likely to be supported on FreeBSD?
Is there any interest in this?
Regards
Sara.
-
Sara Dickinson
http://sinodun.com <http://sinodun.com/>
___
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
well the next step is to make it a dependancy so that free bsd won't
install without it, and to inject it in many binaries that insure
Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 11 Oct 2014, at 21:58, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
What action items are left to enable VIMAGE by default for FreeBSD 11?
Are there any tests results showing performance implications on different
network-related workloads?
Not everyone uses bhyve, so VIMAGE
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
> Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>> Off the top of my head I don't know of another OS that does this.
>>
>> But yes agreed changing that behavior would probably effect a lot of
>> people in a negative way at this point.
>>
>> Not to mention script bre
I've tried
# echo f2 > /dev/led/em0
to make the em0 falshes but it doesn't work! Is there anybody who have the
experience of working with led(4)?
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, h bagade wrote:
>
> I'm searching for a method or configuration which wh
