noting that we can't get rid of the conditional branch no matter whether we
assign twice or assign once, regardless of whether the condition is expressed
as a trinary expression or an if-else chain. i didn't mean to imply otherwise.
On Monday, June 9, 2025 5:19:53 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 04:42:55AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ...
> I've made a number of inline comments.
tyvm! this is precisely the kind of review i'd hoped for. see inline.
> > - so->so_fibnu
On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 10:40 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2025 17:26, Paul Procacci wrote:
> > Re:
> > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/dhclient-trashing-alias-ip-address-upon-reconnect.58729/
> >
> > You can use a dhclient.conf(5) entry like this to guar
Re:
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/dhclient-trashing-alias-ip-address-upon-reconnect.58729/
You can use a dhclient.conf(5) entry like this to guarantee that the
alias is re-applied every time the interface gets a new address from
DHCP (or the old lease is re-applied):
Code:
alias
On Monday, May 19, 2025 6:09:08 PM UTC Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > Am 19.05.2025 um 19:28 schrieb Paul Vixie :
> >
> > If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests
> > always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces?
If we move all member ifaddrs to the bridge itself, then will arp requests
always have to be broadcast on all member interfaces? If so this is intolerable
from a security perspective, a complete nonstarter.
On Friday, March 21, 2025 8:22:56 AM UTC Paul Vixie wrote:
> This is a reply to the second of two of Julian's recent messages.
>
> On Friday, March 14, 2025 4:45:48 AM UTC Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > I think the order of evaluation would be Process FIB highest pr
This is a reply to the second of two of Julian's recent messages.
On Friday, March 14, 2025 4:45:48 AM UTC Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 2/21/25 8:35 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 20, 2025 4:47:41 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at
This is a reply to the first of two of Julian's recent messages.
On Friday, March 14, 2025 4:26:30 AM UTC Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 1/28/25 12:09 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 08:44:25PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> >> does anyone remember why the FIB
On Friday, February 21, 2025 12:35:17 AM UTC Paul Vixie wrote:
> On Thursday, February 20, 2025 4:47:41 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 05:16:07AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > this is the second fibnum patch, ...
now third, having ported the work to
On Thursday, February 20, 2025 4:47:41 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 05:16:07AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > this is the second fibnum patch, ...
>
> The high-level changes seem to be:
> - If a TCP listening socket's FIB is 0, then the FIB of i
-
On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 3:34:45 AM UTC Santiago Martinez wrote:
> > > here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and
> &
On Monday, January 13, 2025 6:59:20 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:17:48AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 11, 2025 4:51:07 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 06:25:22AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> >
On Saturday, January 11, 2025 4:51:07 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 06:25:22AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ...
On Monday, January 6, 2025 3:56:55 PM UTC Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 08:48:48AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > ...
> I think the patch is probably a good idea, and the trick of only
> inheriting the packet's FIB if the socket's is non-zero would avoid
p.
Julian, if not this, then what use cases were you acting from when giving
interfaces a FIB in the first place?
Vixie
Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
On Dec 30, 2024 08:06, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/24/24 1:06 PM, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>> i&
at the form it takes in the source code (all those
macros) could
be simplified.
> FIBs are useful as is, but also can be used with "ipfw setfib" that make
> it irreplaceable.
For my primary FIB use case, ipfw is OK, but I think we need a different
default. To that
end, see Message-ID <38589000.xm6rczx...@dhcp-151.access.rits.tisf.net>.
--
Paul Vixie
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 3:34:45 AM UTC Santiago Martinez wrote:
> Hi,
> here’s another user of fibs. Each of our servers have multiple fibs and
> jails with fibs. I like the proposed.
> Santi
Cool. Read on.
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 5:06:32 AM UTC Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
so interesting but is a separate matter since
those
servers already have to maintain socket-per-interface in order to get their
source
addresses to match the client's destination address.)
--
Paul Vixie
le the `problem' occurs.
My guess is packets are getting shuttled between a global taskqueue thread.
This is the default, or at least I'm not aware of this default being
changed.
You can try enabling `options RSS' in your kernel as this would introduce a
taskqueue worker thread per cpu.
~Paul
--
__
:(){ :|:& };:
with "add pass udp" one creates a rule that permits initial fragments of a
datagram, or unfragmented datagram, to pass. if this doesn't happen, then no
subsequent fragment will matter even if allowed through -- because there will
be no endpoint state to allow those fragments to be reassembled. s
<>
That's been a very workable system.
p vixie
On May 17, 2024 21:32, "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> Scott writes:
> > Anyway, fun's over. Perhaps this is a greater lesson that the Foundation
> > provide the rules under which code is added or removed from base and then
> > we'd all be
i think it's not too soon for the bsd community to become less
reactionary. (yes, i know that's ironic coming from me.)
https://nomadbsd.org/
i'd like freebsd to be fit for a lot of purposes. a complete OS is one
of those that i will use the most. but not the only one for me, and not
the only
agreed. and one of my mods to the ultrix (~4.3bsd) kernel for
gatekeeper.dec.com back in ~1990 was to use the result of gethostid(3)
if that result was nonzero and if a socket was not already bound. so
named(8) and ntpd(8) and anything else that used explicit binding got
what they expected, but
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:04 PM Lexi Winter wrote:
> Paul Procacci:
> > I'm assigning VF's to bhyve with pci passthru.
> [...]
> > Given this, I figured the best option would be to set the VLAN on the VF
> on
> > the host prior to handing it off to the
l(4) which is a real possibility, it supports 'VLAN
tag insertion/extraction'.
Has anyone done this? Does anyone have any pointers to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Paul
--
__
:(){ :|:& };:
You don't need L2 for this. The firewall pattern when your bare metal host has
an address in the vlan you use for guests is:
Allow the specific things you want the bare metal host to do;
Deny all else involving the bare metal host;
Allow all else involving the guest subnet.
p vixie
ed maste pointed me here after he saw me post the following on twixter:
>
to be clear, i can fix this and submit a patch, but won't if there ar
---
# cat /etc/rc.conf
hostname="gateway"
ifconfig_igb0="DHCP"
ifconfig_igb0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv -no_radr"
rtsold_enable="YES"
ifconfig_igb1="inet 10.112.146.1/24 fib 1"
local_unbound_enable="YES"
sshd_enable="Y
(think of the jail as being a private environment where I
cannot route my SNMP requests to).
Thanks
Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
re part of).
and then I had to set the mac address for the ngeth interface that was
set to be put into the jail
ifconfig ngeth0 ether 02:00:01:02:03:04
Once done, and the jail started, ngeth0 worked as expected.
In ESXi, the portgroup that vmx0 is connected to allowed spoofing and
promiscuous mo
he problem went away
> when I connected the two machines with a cable, bypassing the network.
> Might be worth a try, if you can do it?
>
> Good luck with it, rick
>
> ____
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf
> of Paul
19 October 2019, 19:35:24, by "Michael Tuexen"
:
> > On 19. Oct 2019, at 18:09, Paul wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Thank you, for taking your time!
> >
> > We use physical machines. We don not have any special `pf` rules.
>
8, timeout 0
Non-2xx or 3xx responses: 43616
Requests/sec: 4318.26
Transfer/sec: 1.25MB
Do note, that, not only multiple queues cause issues they also dramatically
decrease the performance of the network.
Using `sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.ts_offset_per_conn=0` didn't help at all.
Best regards,
-Paul
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
/net/intel-ixl-kmod): ixl-1.11.9
Help with this matter would be really appreciated.
Best regards,
-Paul
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> Please find a patch in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20980
>
> If possible, please test and report.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> >
> > I'm using FreeBSD 12 on my desktop and can confirm problem occur with some
> > hosts.
> >
> >
>
Hi Michael,
9 July 2019, 15:34:29, by "Michael Tuexen" :
>
>
> > On 8. Jul 2019, at 17:22, Paul wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 8 July 2019, 17:12:21, by "Michael Tuexen" :
> >
> >>> On 8. Jul 2019, at 15:24, Paul wrote
8 July 2019, 17:12:21, by "Michael Tuexen" :
> > On 8. Jul 2019, at 15:24, Paul wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > 8 July 2019, 15:53:15, by "Michael Tuexen" :
> >
> >>> On 8. Jul 2019, at 12:37, Paul wrote:
> &
Hi Michael,
8 July 2019, 15:53:15, by "Michael Tuexen" :
> > On 8. Jul 2019, at 12:37, Paul wrote:
> >
> > Hi team,
> >
> > Recently we had an upgrade to 12 Stable. Immediately after, we have started
> > seeing some strange connection esta
Hi team,
Recently we had an upgrade to 12 Stable. Immediately after, we have started
seeing some strange connection establishment timeouts to some fixed number
of external (world) hosts. The issue was persistent and easy to reproduce.
Thanks to a patience and dedication of our system engineer we
Hi dev team,
It's not a secret that when application is trying to establish new TCP
connection, without
first binding a socket to specific local interface address, OS handles that
automatically.
Unfortunately there is a catch, that lies in a different logic of local port
allocation:
(1) when s
nto the pfil(9) framework. The bridge can be used
as a traffic shaper with altq(4) or dummynet(4).
What am I missing?
thanks!
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD unix:
7:46PM up 4:50, 9 users, load averages: 0.52, 0.41, 0.32
___
freebsd-net@
ergy, Government, Banking, Legal,
Transportation, Wholesale, Agriculture, Business Service, Marketing, Education,
Hospitality And Media Internet.
Let me know if you are interested and I will get back to you with the counts,
sample and pricing.
Await for your response.
Regards,
Paul Kelly
Data Consultant
your Swift Response
Regards,
Paul Christopher
Marketing Manager
Cordell Data Marketing Inc.
984 Rowley Drive
San Jose 95132
United States
To opt out please response Remove in subject line.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https:
On 18/08/2016 21:55, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Paul A. Procacci
wrote:
You should be able to ping the local subnet.
Alternatively you can use net/arping.
~Paul
I'm specifically looking to test the handling of 255.255.255.255, so a
local broadcast address i
On my production systems, I've never seen it deviate without hardware
changes.
Are you seeing otherwise?
On 6/29/2015 午後 04:23, Wei Hu wrote:
Hi,
On a FreeBSD system with multiple NICs, ie, multiple MAC addresses, is there a
way to keep the same network interface name to MAC address mapping
ivers might have this issue?
I've certainly seen performance decrease in the past between two
machines with igb interfaces when the MTU was raised to use 9k frames.
Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
#x27;t know how this can be dealt with unless we have a load of
special-cases that log warnings when, for example, forwarding is enabled
in sysctl.conf but there isn't a gateway_enable in rc.conf. That sounds
like a messy solution to be honest.
Paul.
__
d-net
Paul.
On 24/04/2015 17:47, Paul S. wrote:
Can confirm that anything to do with netif restart on a forwarding
interface also creates the same problem.
On 4/25/2015 午前 01:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwa
Can confirm that anything to do with netif restart on a forwarding
interface also creates the same problem.
On 4/25/2015 午前 01:46, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Just saw this. Can somebody re-produce this?
root@m4fh2:~ # sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
root@m4fh2:~ # i
Additionally, pmacct doesn't seem to really work in FreeBSD -- as far as
the latest versions go.
Their use of 'return' (with no args) on functions that are meant to
return an int flat out makes it unable to compile on FreeBSD.
If you fix those by hand, it compiles, but just seems to segfault
van Gyzen wrote:
On 3/19/2015 午前 11:20, Paul S. wrote:
root@ipfw-0:~ # arp -d 110.62..211.87
arp: writing to routing socket: Invalid argument
I have a vague memory of similar behavior when I had a misconfigured
route. I think there was a route for a local interface address with an
off-box gateway
I just noticed that when obfuscating the IP, I added two dots.
Please excuse them, the IP is proper (110.62.211.87 for the purposes of
this thread)
On 3/19/2015 午前 11:20, Paul S. wrote:
Hi,
Seeing this on 10.1-release p5.
FreeBSD ipfw-0.syd.fqdn.tld 10.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5
Hi,
Seeing this on 10.1-release p5.
FreeBSD ipfw-0.syd.fqdn.tld 10.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5 #0
r278455: Mon Feb 9 07:18:21 UTC 2015
r...@ipfw-0.syd.fqdn.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/qfkern amd64
Basically, I have a static arp entry that I cannot remove. This in
itself is not a pro
Joe,
That was it, thank you! I looked over net.inet.ip and ip6, icmp never
crossed my mind.
George, thank you as well.
On 3/10/2015 午後 11:40, Joe Holden wrote:
On 10/03/2015 13:16, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On 10 Mar 2015, at 11:26, Paul S. wrote:
Hi,
I've been deploying FreeB
Hi,
I've been deploying FreeBSD as customer edge routers for customers with
sites that do not require high throughput (>1g/s).
Each site has two ISPs (Mostly Telstra + Verizon/Optus), and take full
routes via OpenBGPd and BIRD. I use next-hop self on all received routes.
The FreeBSD boxes h
S" in /etc/rc.conf should fix this.
Paul.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
net.inet.ip.fastforwarding: 1
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 1
That's quite ... odd, to sat the least. I can't see anything in
devd.conf which would relate to a new interface being created, but that
doesn't mean that there isn't some magic functional
as a router, so don't know if this crept in
between 10.0 and 10.1 or 9 and 10.
Paul.
On 03/01/2015 13:12, wishmaster wrote:
Hi,
I have been seeing strange behavior of my system lately. After creating new interface the
system variable net.inet.ip.forwarding becomes "0".
E.g.
to configure the SPDs.
Cheers!
On 9/21/2014 午後 07:35, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul S. <mailto:cont...@winterei.se>> wrote:
Ermal,
I'd prefer a raw BSD installation (Call it a comfort thing, if you
will).
Has the pfSense project ac
Interesting.
Would you happen to know where I could obtain sources to their version
of OpenBGPD, then?
Thanks!
On 9/21/2014 午後 07:35, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul S. <mailto:cont...@winterei.se>> wrote:
Ermal,
I'd prefer a raw BSD inst
Thank you for responding!
On 9/21/2014 午後 07:26, Ermal Luçi wrote:
If for you is an option pfSense has all the hard work done for you and
you can use it for such installations.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Paul S. <mailto:cont...@winterei.se>> wrote:
Hi folks,
I plan to
Hi folks,
I plan to make an edge router out of a freebsd system with OpenBGPD +
FreeBSD 10, or such.
I've been reading up, and noticed that the net.inet.ip.fastforwarding
flag provides rather nice performance benefits.
My issue is, my upstream networks insist on using TCP MD5 authentication
fined correctly.
> The same as above.
> Better use 10.0.0.53/24 or 10.0.0.53 netmask 255.255.255.0
I can't believe it was such a stupid mistake from my end :-)
I guess you could say I had a syntax error ;-)
Sorry for the trouble, and thank you
me info;
- we are running FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p10.
- in dmesg we had "ifa_del_loopback_route: deletion failed".
- interestingly enough, the other 10.0.0.150 alias worked just fine.
Perhaps something is mis-configured in /etc/rc.conf? Some argument is
missing in ifconfig_* variables ?
92.168.1.xx/24).
>
> Hope that makes it clearer, and I appreciate any help.
>
> Sami
> 29 2013 03:30, ?? "Paul A. Procacci"
> :
The answer I provided you does exactly what you want it to do. Not to mention
the man page goes over other things a
10.0.0.100 # LSNAT
redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.1:80,192.168.0.10:22
500# LSNAT
---
~Paul
This message may contain confidential or privileged informat
mind it does. ;)
#
ipfw table 10 add 129.168.0.0/24 1234
ipfw table 10 add 10.5.21.0/24 5678
ipfw add 100 divert tablearg ip from table(10) to any
#
Perhaps knowing what it is you are trying to accomplish wou
arting place for you.
~Paul
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message.
See http://www.datapipe.com/legal/email_disclaimer/ for further informat
re and sysctl's governing
their operation.
~Paul
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message.
See http://www.datapipe.com/legal/email_di
On 01/25/13 17:34, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:14:51PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 01/25/13 10:19, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:48:04PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 01/24/13 15:50, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39:44PM -0600
On 01/24/13 15:50, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39:44PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 01/24/13 09:09, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:48PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
Hi,
I've got a Dell R200 which I'm trying to build into a gateway with
On 01/24/13 09:09, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:46:48PM -0600, Paul Keusemann wrote:
Hi,
I've got a Dell R200 which I'm trying to build into a gateway with a Sun
QGE (501-6738-10). The cas driver fails to load the first time I try to
load it but succeeds the s
ss: 00:14:4f:25:ca:13
Jan 22 14:04:33 lucid kernel: cas3: [FILTER]
The following are attached:
/var/run/dmesg.boot
dmesg output after the second attempt to load the cas driver.
/var/log/messages after the second attemp to load the cas driver.
--
Paul Keusemann
n late 2010. It has one example of creating vitual
interfaces using the netgraph module. 3rd post from the top.
I'm not entirely sure if this is the current _correct_ way, but I imagine is
still accurate and can be used to get you started.
~Paul
This messag
gt; http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Now sure about pfsense, but I use ipfw w/ weighted queues pretty effectively.
~Paul
This message may contain confidenti
In dhcp.conf it describes ways to assign client's to classes. It further
explains
how to `deny` or `allow` those clients assigned to those classes.
Read the subsection from dhcpd.conf(5) called `SUBCLASSES`. It provides an
example which almost answers your question in its entirety.
~Pau
ose and is quite
clean IMO. It's also not necessary to run multiple server processes
(like sshd, sendmail, httpd) for every routing domain.
With kind regards,
Paul Schenkeveld
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
tcpdump -ni src host
tcpdump -ni not src host
~Paul
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:35:29AM +, m s wrote:
> hi all. I want to use tcpdump just for input or just for outout
> packet.isthis possible ? if no is there any other command that do
> this?
h "subsystem" "em0_or_whatever";
match "type" "LINK_DOWN";
action "/usr/local/sbin/script_to_do_something.sh down";
};
##
~Paul
This message m
- What bind listening? (Can you see it with netstat?)
- What port is it listening to?
- What errors (if any) are in the error log?
I'm afraid your question really isn't a specific FreeBSD problem.
You might have better luck on the BIND mailing list.
~Paul
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at
Have you set net.link.ether.ipfw?
~Paul
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:34:04PM +0430, h bagade wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem using ipfw firewall. I have a topology connected as below:
>
> A(192.168.1.55) - (192.168.1.1)my_sys(192.168.2.1)
> ---(192.168.2.12)B
>
Nothing logged in /var/log/* or crashes that exist in /var/crash would indicate
to me some sort of hardware related problem.
Have you tested your hardware lately and know that it is in operational order?
~Paul
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:36:54PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
5 priority 128 path cost 200
member: em0 flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 2
vboxnet0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500
ether 0a:00:27:00:00:00
Thanks!
Paul Schenkeveld
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
; 3 2
auth 10.5.21.5:1645 "SuperSkret" 3 2
~Paul
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:24:03AM +0330, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
> hello guys,
> i wanna have authentication via radius server. in my local network,
> one system is radius server and the others are clients. the server is
> runnin
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:02:22PM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "Paul A. Procacci" writes:
>
> > Is your DHCP daemon setup to listen on the interface where the AP is
> > running?
>
> Dunno... How could eventually be sure Windows got i
Is your DHCP daemon setup to listen on the interface where the AP is running?
For username/password prompt upon browser launch, you'll need to configure a
reverse proxy to get a cookie upon successful auth to pass through the proxy.
~Paul
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:49:01PM -0800, Adrian
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-April/196532.html
Not sure about ps/et al, but you can do it according to that post. Nearly 2
years old now.
~Paul
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:12:17PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to find out the de
place to redirect the packet to the nat instance? I do not see any.
~Paul
This message may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise us immediately and delete this message.
See http://www.datapipe.
On 11/22/11, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:49:16PM +0000, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch should fix panic on amd64 when using ndis with drivers
>> which make use of fpu registers.
> Do not allocate fpu_kern_ctx on stack. Its si
Hi,
This patch should fix panic on amd64 when using ndis with drivers
which make use of fpu registers.
diff --git a/sys/compat/ndis/kern_windrv.c b/sys/compat/ndis/kern_windrv.c
index 5572988..1a93b54 100644
--- a/sys/compat/ndis/kern_windrv.c
+++ b/sys/compat/ndis/kern_windrv.c
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 08:57:46PM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote:
> Gents,
>
> I'm having quite an aweful problem that I need a bit of help with.
>
> I have an HPDL360 G3 (
> http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11504_na/11504_na.HTML ) which
> acts as a NAT
.16.0.3 netmask 0xfffc broadcast 172.19.255.255
inet6 fe80::20b:cdff:feca:1a74%bge1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
nd6 options=3
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT )
status: active
#
On 8/21/2011 1:47 AM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 1:30, Paul Herman wrote:
--010305010708060807000808
Content-Type: application/gzip;
name="carp_ip6_alias.patch.gz"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
The following reply was made to PR kern/127050; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Paul Herman
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Wouter de Jong , Jacek Zapala
Subject: Re: kern/127050: [carp] ipv6 does not work on carp interfaces
[regression]
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:13:46 +0200
This is a
On 07/27/11 06:50, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 07/26/11 08:05, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:53:59AM -0500, Paul Keusemann wrote:
Again, sorry for the sluggish response.
On 07/20/11 15:15, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue
On 07/26/11 08:05, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 06:53:59AM -0500, Paul Keusemann wrote:
Again, sorry for the sluggish response.
On 07/20/11 15:15, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:26:34PM -0500, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 07/07/11 14:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 7
Again, sorry for the sluggish response.
On 07/20/11 15:15, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:26:34PM -0500, Paul Keusemann wrote:
On 07/07/11 14:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Paul Keusemann wrote:
My setup is something like this:
- My local network is a mix
Once again, apologies for my sluggish response. The VPN problem is a
background job worked on when I can or when I'm too annoyed by it to do
anything else.
On 07/12/11 17:42, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Paul Keusemann wrote:
So, any other ideas on how to debug
1 - 100 of 427 matches
Mail list logo
