[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks for your analysis Niranjan. Could you please elaborate on what
> you meant about the lcp.c patch not being the correct approach? I think
> Mike has tested it in multiple situations, and it has worked well for a
> guy in the same situatio
a problem with the way the FreeBSD kernel PPP
implementation handles LQR and you can see it in the log below. (The
unisphere at the other end isn't perfect either and has its own
issues!)
regards,
niranjan
[log start]
> Jan 3 21:28:11 nn ppp[69401]: Phase: Using interface: tun0
> J
