Just curious would it be better to add a rule to allowe 67 & 68 (tcp &
udp) in from the dhcp server instead of leaving the box all open?
Understand I've never attempted this booting a diskless, but it seems
like something worth trying
Atanu Ghosh wrote:
From my notes when trying to get dis
ps ax |awk '/dhclient/{print $1; exit}'`
cheers,
mikel
nascar24 wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> My FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE machine is connected to the internet via a
> cable connection. And when booting (or running dhclient) I get an IP
> address. But when I have an IP address and my ISP wan
I believe there's a regedit that you need to perform to enable the
termserver to recognise itself behind the firewall. I can't for the life
of me remember exactly what, but I know it's in their knowledge base
somewhere...
cheers,
mikel
Tony Saign wrote:
> Anyone have any
Chrisy Luke wrote:
> Mikel King wrote (on Nov 16):
> > Just curious, but what's a doddle?
>
> It's like a doodle, but with less o's and more d's. :)
>
> It essentially means "this is easy to do".
>
> Chris.
> --
> == [EMAIL PR
Just curious, but what's a doddle?
Cheers,
mikel
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Chrisy Luke wrote:
> > > > only packets already leaving the system can be hijacked and forwarded
> > > > to a 2nd machine. Incoming packets can only be forwarded
I would. In fact my company has plans to do that very same thing in the near
future...hopefully with BGP...
cheers,
mikel
John Telford wrote:
> Is there a way to do the opposite of Peter Brezny's question "Redundant
> connections from separate isp's possible?"
uff, then blast itbut hey I
tend to be a bit of an extremist in these cases...
Cheers,
mikel
"Zaitsau, Andrei" wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have a problem, in the morning someone hacked into my computer at home. It
> is ADSL Gateway running FreeBSD 3.4 , root password is ch
