Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-09 Thread mi+mx
s reason but the card I =purchased turned out to be an ATM155 model. Thanks, but reducing the clutter of the external devices is the whole point of my excercise :-) -mi =http://people.freebsd.org/~bms/dump/idt/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing l

Re: switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread mi+mx
based on Efficient Network's chip. Can there be anything else? -mi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

switching to an internal DSL modem -- natd, ipfw

2004-02-05 Thread mi+mx
umber - 00010001 Hardware Instance Number - 0 Driver Name - enatm0 (notice the ``en'' in the driver name) But -- will natd(8), the ipfw (4) and (8) work properly with en0? Any other potential problems? Thank

jumbo-frames on the network

2004-01-28 Thread mi+mx
s for any advice! -mi ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

using ipfw's ``pipe'' to limit icmp traffic

2001-06-06 Thread mi
, that I'm trying to limit, not the minimum latency! Even more bizarre is that the ping times are _higher_ when pings originate from the firewall itself, compared to those, that originate from inside the firewalled network... What am I doing wrong? Thanks! -mi To Unsubs

Re: maxing out the 100Mb TX (full duplex)

2001-04-27 Thread mi
Ok, the switch does support EtherChannel (calling it "aggregation"). Now, should we try the wpaul's fec or the ng_one2many? And what's the difference? Thanks a lot for your time, gentlemen! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscr

Re: maxing out the 100Mb TX (full duplex)

2001-04-26 Thread mi
the two fxp-cards are on-board... We would like to, of course, use what we already have first. Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: transparent proxying through a separate machine

2001-02-01 Thread mi
lks to the web-server directly :( The squid's log is quiet... Anything I'm missing? Perhaps, I need a user-space program of some sort to run on the firewall to do the tunneling? Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

transparent proxying through a separate machine

2001-02-01 Thread mi
seem to work -- squid never gets contacted. All of the recipes out there describe the setups with squid and the firewall being on the same machine. What else do I need to do? Thanks! -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the b