Thank you,
I certainly will.
On Nov 20, 2012, at 8:23 PM, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
> The next time you have a chance to do high PPS tests, please compile
> in KTR and take a schedgraph trace or two.
>
> Read the schedgraph.py source in /usr/src/tools/ for a quick overview.
>
> It'd be nice to h
I may be misstating.
Specifically under high burst floods either routed or being dropped by pf we
would see the system go unresponsive to user-level applications / SSH for
example.
The system would still function but it was inaccessible. To clarify as well
this was any number of floods or atta
I got side tracked and missed the new system question.
In a newer system with an Intel em card then you likely won't need it. However
don't play with the HZ settings. If you still see the delays recompile with
polling on default.
Verify on the NIC as well such as ifconfig em0
If it isn't on yo
Barney - I would certainly love to see some real evidence to backup such a
ridiculous claim.
I agree here as well with Jim. I have a ton of experience with and without. I
haven't done enough testing with FreeBSD 9 to state 100% but I can state that
extensive testing and filtering traffic (speci
