The following reply was made to PR kern/157418; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Wojciech A. Koszek"
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, to...@tutus.se
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/157418: [em] em driver lockup during boot on Supermicro
X9SCM-F
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:59:31 +0200
Hello
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:01:00PM +0100, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 11:36:15AM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
>
> > > What could be ? What could I try ? Ideas ?
> >
> > You can check if changing the interface "UP" flag makes in
hen it will be supported in RELENG_6...
>
> Many thanks for your answer!
You might want to generate a patch for RELENG_6 for yourself, if it's a
matter of quirk with proper ID. This should only apply if probe method
doesn't return true in your case, and none other changes were mad
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 09:47:47AM +0100, Alessandro de Manzano wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> What could be ? What could I try ? Ideas ?
You can check if changing the interface "UP" flag makes in any better:
ifconfig up
--
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://Fr
http://people.freebsd.org/~wkoszek/hash.c
..compile without warnings with WARNS=5. If noone objects, I'd like to
commit it.
Thanks,
--
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://FreeBSD.czest.pl/dunstan/
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
Hello,
Here is a patch for ef(4) which adds some locking:
http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/if_ef.1.patch
It's known to be not entirely right, but could be commited to improve
current situation of ef(4). Testers are welcome.
Thanks,
--
Wojciech A. Koszek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:32:35PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > With Gleb's help I've written patch for ng_bridge(4) which makes it ready
> > for running multithreaded. I
e who uses ng_bridge(4) on MP
machine are welcome.
Cheers,
--
* Wojciech A. Koszek && [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:45:06AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:37:35PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:27AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:20:34PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wr
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:45:06AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 01:37:35PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:27AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:20:34PM +, Wojciech A. Koszek wr
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:27AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:20:34PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
[..]
>
> Is it still a problem or did you test on a pre r1.26 kernel?
>
Results from -CURRENT: I got panic if
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 09:23:27AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:20:34PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is EVENTHANDLER(9) proper way of notification for standalone driver about
> > network interface attach/detach
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:25:44PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:20:34PM +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is EVENTHANDLER(9) proper way of notification for standalone driver about
> > network interface attach/detach operatio
situation is almost the same like this current in if_bridge(4). Just
repeat situation described above for ef(4), but with if_bridge(4).
Regards,
--
* Wojciech A. Koszek && [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
t to
> get an ifnet pointer and thus causes a panic. You might also try the
> following patch which fixes a couple bugs I think are unrelated, but may
> not be.
Hello,
As I've written earlier, I had some time to analyze it.
Detailed description: kern/84987
Patch is here:
http://f
15 matches
Mail list logo
