hi, everyone:
I recently under FreeBSD, want to achieve pkt-gen can send more traffic,
because I did not ixgb card, only a plurality of igb, want to achieve produce
4,5Gbps flow test server. But I encountered some problems.
1. Open the first one process, works well, the flow reaches full band
that
they will maintain the connection state only for a short time without
connectivity.
[0] - http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5482
Best Regards,
Fang Wang
Index: sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
===
--- sys/netinet/tcp_input.c (revision 19645
Hi,
The tcp UTO option described in RFC 5482 now is accomplished. The
branch is //depot/projects/soc2009/tcputo/.
Regards,
Fang Wang
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send
ut I
think there may be some better ideas.
Regards,
Fang Wang
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I have rolled back to release 7 kernel. The problem is still there.
The problem is seen only when the single tagged frame ingresses from an
ether node. I tested it on bge and fxp cards. If the single tagged frame
was injected from an eiface interface, there is no problem.
BR
Younger Wang
I diffed ng_vlan source between release 7 and vimage_7-20080228. They
are identical.
I will discard my own modification and try original vimage_7-20080228;
if it does not still work, I will roll back to release 7 kernel and try
again. Thank you so much for the hints.
BR
Younger Wang
Younger Wang
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 5:12 PM
To: Younger Wang
Subject: Re: (Netgraph problem) Inner tag and outer tag swapped
Younger Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> fxp0 is connected to a trunk port. Fra
hub_c4000: vlan up vlan4000
ngctl name hub_c4000:up vlan_QinQ
ngctl mkpeer vlan_QinQ: hub downstream down0
ngctl name vlan_QinQ:downstream hub_QinQ
ngctl msg vlan_QinQ: addfilter { vlan=4000 hook="vlan4000" }
BR
Younger Wang
___
f
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<... snip the orig Q, rfc3884 bits, and the gif stuff...>
You won't have any problem is you are using IP-IP
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 8/18/06, Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Remko Lodder wrote:
> I was looking around for using IPsec services instead of
> OpenVPN services, but I found out that with our current
> implementation of IPsec, we cannot actually route packets
> t
Remko Lodder wrote:
Hi friends,
I was looking around for using IPsec services instead of
OpenVPN services, but I found out that with our current
implementation of IPsec, we cannot actually route packets
through the various IPsec hops [1]. OpenBSD adds IPsec
flows in their routing table, making
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi all,
I am trying to get FreeBSD installed and running on a new rack server
(asus ap140r-e1). The rack has a Intel Pro/1000 Nic (Intelr 82541GI
Gigabit Controller).
I have tried both freebsd 4.10 and 5.3 - and after installation both
detect the network card and ifconfig shows it. I provided t
t]>-- 'lower' -->--`
^
[ether_input]
^
|
device
Sincerely Yours,
Jian-Wei Wang
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
.
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Hi,
I think it's specified in RFC 2644. It might be useful
to site it in the comments of the code.
Regards,
yushun.
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Informati
n't use that many gifs
in their notebooks. :-)
yushun.
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
Hi,
I need source code for fetching MAC address on a FreeBSD 4.2/PC/Ethernet
platform.
Where can I find it ?
Thanks in advance.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
;s in either
-stable or -current. Probably will be included in
FreeBSD 4.3.
regards,
yushun.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> Hi Yu-Shun,
>
> -On [20010308 22:05], Yu-Shun Wang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Has the topic of
eeBSD.
yushun
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
What you pointed out below is true. But I am more
interested in the relative performance since the number
I measured were under exactly the same setup and traffic
condition. I am just curious why IPComp was _relatively_
(and signigicantly) slower than m
lease boxes (PIII 733MHz,
256MB RDRAM) connected through Ethernet switch.
Thanks,
yushun.
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Science
etdomain,IPPROTO_IPCOMP, PR_ATOMIC|PR_ADDR,
- ipcomp4_input,0, 0, 0,
- 0,
- 0,0, 0, 0,
&nousrreqs
},
#ifdef IPSEC_ESP
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[
> > I tried to measure bandwidth with IPComp enabled, but kept
> > getting the error message "no response" from netperf
> > (/usr/ports/benchmark/netperf).
> >
> > For all I could tell from tcpdump, netperf established ctrl
> > channel, and about 5 to 8 packets were sent with I
yushun.
____
Yu-Shun Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Information Sciences Institute
University of Southern California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
25 matches
Mail list logo
