On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Ok
>
> I too have been struck by this *multiple* times on my base home router.
>
I hate "me too" style posts, since often they conflate unrelated
issues - however, "me too"!
In my scenario, I have a simple home router with a wan if connec
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
>
> I want to thank all of the various people who offered help, advice,
> and suggestings regarding this problem. It's all really appreciated.
>
> Since I first posted about this issue, I have diligently tried to
> isolate/debug the p
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
wrote:
> Sergey,
>
> It was upgraded from 8.2-RELEASE via freebsd-update so I'd assume the kernel
> and world are in sync.
>
Confirm this, eg by running "ident /usr/bin/netstat"
You could also try the IDS feature of freebsd-update to check
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> Now that will at
> least have the proper IP address in it _however_ there does not seem to
> be any way to entice the DHCP client to place certain "options" into the
> /etc/resolv.conf file. That's a pity, because I wanted one
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> No, it would use the published MX records for the domain, and would first try
> delivering to vapor.isi.edu as the lowest precedence MX host listed:
Thats what I said wasn't it?
Oh wait, I missed the words 'If we assume it doesn't have an M
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Tom Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > FreeB
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE:
> >
> > # host koin-nkz.com.
> > koin-nkz.com has address 62.231.164.101
> > Host koin-nkz.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> >
> > This domain does not have MX r
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Krishna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am implementing a user space program to create and assign IPv6 address to
> a linux host.
> I am able to create and assign the IP successfully. But, if i am assigning
> the duplicate address,
> still the address gets assigned. I understand
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 14:03 +0100, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
>
> Please note that, for IPsec (and for IKE negociations), 0.0.0.0/0 does
> NOT means "any IP", it does REALLY means "the network with base
> address 0.0.0.0 and 0 bits of netmask".
>
>
> Yvan.
Could you define an IPv4 IP address that
On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:09 +0100, Lazar Szilard wrote:
> hi,
>
>
>
> I have a beginner quieston.
>
> I use FreeBSD 7.1-RC1 without X on my notebook.
>
> How can I configure my network to
>
> 1. use proxy to http or ftp connections (proxy address: (10.0.1.1:8080)
>
> or (on another place, w
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:53 -0300, Paulo Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We was using one machine with FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE running
> apache-worker-2.2.3 + mysql, this server can answer high request from
> one client using ab:
>
>
> {client}$ ab -n 2000 -c 1000 http://system_using_6.4-RELEASE
> ...
>
On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 13:54 +0100, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> I don't know exact requirements and application used, but given IP TV
> deployments relying heavily on multicast, and all other "VoD"
> technologies also using multicast...I find Your comments disturbing :)
>
> However, if you don't cont
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:41 +0200, Yehonatan Yossef wrote:
> I'm looking into the syslogd capabilities at the moment, it might be
> enough.
> I've tried following the serial console setup you've pointed, but when I
> added the 'console="comconsole"' to loader.conf the OS hanged during
> boot time,
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 12:55 +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> I want to fix the SCTP code such that you can compile without
> INET6.
>
> I also wanted to figure out if one can change the SCTP code
> such that SCTP can be build with INET6 and without INET...
> But it seems that this does
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:48 +0900, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:45:13PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> >Any chance the recent root zone changes would make it to 7.0?
>
> Erm, curious, what where these changes in the first place ?
>
> -aW
>
>
From cvs-all:
dougb
15 matches
Mail list logo
