hi,
although it is still in alpha quality, we have a library, named
libnetnice, which i think is the best match for your purpose.
http://www.netnice.org
http://sourceforge.net/projects/netnice
if interested, please let me know. or, you may join our libnetnice ML.
http:
hello,
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > i would appreciate any suggestions, comments, feedback, etc.
>
> I haven't looked at the code. Although my question is why do you use
> the proc interface? Can't you make netnice use the socket options
> interface to configure the ban
hi,
Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> I think netnice looks really neat.
>
> Use of /proc would definaly limit the utility of integrating the code.
> We don't enable procfs by default because it's too hard to get procfs
> code right as the list of procfs security advisories demonstr
hi,
Paul Querna wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 23:55 -0400, Takashi Okumura wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > please take a look at mod_netnice. it uses netnice, another in-kernel
> > traffic control primitive on the platform. since you can c
hi,
please take a look at mod_netnice. it uses netnice, another in-kernel
traffic control primitive on the platform. since you can control each
socket with netnice, i think it's easy to extend the module to meet
your needs.
http://www.netnice.org/app_modnetnice.html
Darcy, Hendry, and BABOLO(?),
sorry for the troubles. and, hope the server is accessible now.
i won't use the cheapest registrar ($8.95/year) next time...
anyway. i would appreciate any suggestion, feedback, etc from
the hackers community.
thanks,
-- taka
Dear Hackers,
i would like to introduce my traffic control package for FreeBSD 4.7,
netnice version 2, and recruit some alpha testers.
Netnice Version 2: Alpha Release (Dec 10, 2002)
=
