2, 2015 at 2:29 PM Eric Joyner wrote:
>
>> I guess I could reverse-MFC r283668, then, to make that work on HEAD.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015, 12:07 PM Stefano Garzarella <
>> stefanogarzare...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I tried to c
{NORMAL_C} -I$S/dev/ixgbe"
-dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c optional ix ixv inet \
+dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_x550.c optional ix | ixv inet \
compile-with "${NORMAL_C} -I$S/dev/ixgbe"
dev/ixgbe/ixgbe_dcb.c optional ix ixv inet \
compile-with "${NORMA
Thanks for your report! :)
Cheers,
Stefano
2015-05-28 15:43 GMT+02:00 Oleg Prozorov :
> Hello Stefano,
>
> You make my day :) It works. Greate job.
>
> Ths a lot,
> Oleg.
>
> 2015-05-28 16:26 GMT+03:00 Stefano Garzarella >:
>
>> Hi Oleg,
>> can you tr
interface eth0 to
>>> eth6
>>> [ 1645.949935] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth6: link is not ready
>>> [ 1648.795532] e1000e: eth5 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow
>>> Control: Rx/Tx
>>> [ 1648.795856] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth5: link be
99228 5 e1000e
>
>
> Then even if it shows that link is up net map stops to work and only
> rmmod/insmod and restart of the netmap can bring it back to work.
>
> Could you please help me with it ?
>
> Thx a lot,
> Oleg.
> ____________
gt; I've compiled it with 3.13 under Debian; 3.16 fails to compile because the
> patch doesn't apply cleanly.
>
> Lars
>
--
*Stefano Garzarella*
stefano.garzare...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
Nr. 218/163/00107
> USt-ID-Nr. DE 132747002
>
> Komplementaerin HOB electronic Beteiligungs GmbH
> AG Fuerth, HRB 3416
> _______
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsub
lookup for the entire
> group.
>
> The disadvantages of packet groups would be that:
> a) You have touch a lot more code in a lot more places to take
> advantage of the concept.
> b) TSO inherently has the same layering problems. If we
disable TSO when using IPFW NAT.
>
> Will the software-based GSO play nicely with IPFW NAT? Will it make any
> difference to packet throughput through IPFW?
>
> Or is it still way too early in development to be worrying about such
> things? :)
>
> --
> Freddie Cash
>
:
> On 09/17/14 20:18, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
>> Hi Adrian,
>> the results that I sent, regard just one flow, but I can try with two
>> simultaneous flows and I'll send you the results.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>>
> Hi Stefan
It's for outbound, so it's not _as_ big a deal as it is for inbound,
> but it'd still be nice to know.
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 17 September 2014 01:27, Stefano Garzarella
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have recently worked, during my master’s thesis wi
->m_pkthdr.csum_flags & CSUM_GSO_MASK) != 0), it is segmented
or fragmented, and then they are sent to the device driver.
At https://github.com/stefano-garzarella/freebsd-gso
you can find the kernel patches for FreeBSD-current, FreeBSD
10-stable, FreeBSD 9-stable, a simple application (gso-stats.
2014-07-15 12:00 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> > work.
> > Do you have a panic?
>
> So far, so good. I've ran a couple of i
2014-07-15 11:46 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
> work.
> > Do you have a panic?
>
> Still compiling :) Anyway, you didn't suff
I just tried to run iperf3 with this patch and STABLE-10 and it seems to
work.
Do you have a panic?
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:19 GMT+02:00 Stefano Garzarella :
> I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
> I send you a file with both patches.
>
> Cheers,
> Ste
I think there is some problem with the email formatting.
I send you a file with both patches.
Cheers,
Stefano
2014-07-15 11:12 GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > I used the "oce" driver in CURRENT.
>
GMT+02:00 Borja Marcos :
>
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I found other problems in the "oce" driver during some experiments with
> > netmap in emulation mode.
>
> What about driver version 10.0.747.0? At least in
nting with iperf3 using the same Borja environment and
I don't have panic.
Can you try this patch? Do you still have the panic?
Cheers,
Stefano Garzarella
diff --git a/sys/dev/oce/oce_if.c b/sys/dev/oce/oce_if.c
index af57491..33b35b4 100644
--- a/sys/dev/oce/oce_if.c
+++ b/sys/dev/oce/oce_if.c
@
18 matches
Mail list logo
