t difference I have in the config, apart
from using FIB 1 instead of the default.
And for IPv4, I see that I get the default router through DHCP, but somehow
/sbin/dhclient-script is not adding a default route. If I add it manually, it
will be removed eventually.
Any suggestions?
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
port 30 priority 128 path cost 2000
member: jouk flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 29 priority 128 path cost 2000
member: tap2 flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 9 priority 128 path cost 200
member: vlan100 flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 12 prio
ld this be working? It seems some months ago it was necessary to compile
the Intel driver instead of the in-tree one. I would have assumed that it would
have been integrated by now.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke mailto:s...@lassitu.de>> Fon +49 151 14070811
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
g? It seems some months ago it was necessary to compile
the Intel driver instead of the in-tree one. I would have assumed that it would
have been integrated by now.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mail
Am 13.01.2018 um 23:06 schrieb Stefan Bethke :
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m a bit stumped and are hoping for some helpful pointers.
>
> I have two machines both running a recent 11-stable (SuperMicro X11SSH-F with
> a E3-1240v6); each one is connected to one Ethernet switch thro
bridge0
linkmtu=0, maxmtu=0, curhlim=64, basereachable=30s0ms, reachable=32s,
retrans=1s0ms
Flags: auto_linklocal
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
using create_args_ in rc.conf.
I believe that ifconfig only let’s you work with only one address family per
invocation.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
create_args_tap0="ether 02:00:00:00:01:00"
create_args_tap1="ether 02:00:00:00:01:01"
create_args_tap
Am 16.04.2013 um 12:13 schrieb Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas:
> On 04/16/2013 09:31, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I'm a bit stumped getting a (FreeBSD guest) VM to use bridged networking to
>> work. The same VM works fine on a Mac OS X and an Ubun
bit that I'm missing? Or is there some
incompatibility between if_bridge and ng_ether?
Thanks,
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubs
igure it at the runtime of the kernel.
Except that it is not generally true, but only in specific configurations.
Other boards have other combinations of devices. The Atheros family of
switches is available both embedded into certain SoC as well as
g with the constraints of the embedded-
> world rather than to sprinkle hacks all over the place.
Why is the above is less of a hack than making the ordering in nexus
configurable through a hint?
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
diff --git a/sys/mips/mips/nexus.c b/sys
s (split devices), that would bring
down the necessary changes to just a handful of lines.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
point is that the admin has no need to change it, it's hard coded in the
driver or statically configured via hints. And for all of this discussion, I'm
using MII as a synonym for all xMII busses.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
_
support for a few chipsets in tree
> that work in sufficiently-different manners that they can be models
> for other drivers in the future.
Which is a valid approach from a vendor's viewpoint. The reason we're talking
is to try and make it easier to write a switch driver
L-WR1043ND to separate the WAN from the LAN
ports), and we have test hardware for. In short, don't commit dead code.
Having a description of the generic switch model that the API assumes and
driver-specific documentation also wouldn't hurt. (Yes, I'm volunteering.)
Stefan
spi0
spibus0
mx25l0
ar71xx_wdog0
#
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Am 14.12.2011 um 02:16 schrieb Marius Strobl:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53:48AM -0800, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:04:51AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> Am 13.12.2011 um 03:50 schrieb YongHyeon PYUN:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 13,
rk as a full proxy for any phy driver looks non-trivial to me due
to the API constraints the mii framework imposes.
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
e miibus code to work with the
> notion of non-phy devices? Would that help a bit?
If you wouldn't mind waiting a day or two, I'm working on a suggestion. First
draft RSN…
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd
#x27;ses that are not associated with an interface. The miibus
code assumes that any PHY is attached to an MII connected to an ethernet
interfaces MAC. The switch ports are not part of the ethernet interfaces, and
their MAC configuration doesn'
Am 13.12.2011 um 03:50 schrieb YongHyeon PYUN:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:56:22AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> I'm currently writing a driver to configure an ethernet switch chip (see
>> TL-WR1043ND on -embedded).
>>
>> I noticed that there doesn't seem
hysical connection. With media
subtype "none", a 10 MBit/s half-duplex connection is established, potentially
confusing the remote end about the availability of this link. On the local
side, the link is down, so no packets are ex
ifconfig_tap0="up"
I've set bridge0's MAC address to avoid sillyness with a cheap desktop switch
that would get confused on reboots.
HTH,
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing l
ured, so I'm a bit
confused why if_bridge would not allow the auto-assignment of a link-local
address.
If you have two or more bridged interfaces now, and you enable automatic
assignment of link-local addresses, you already have multiple link-locals this
way; having th
same issue as in this thread?
<http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-March/004813.html
>
HTH,
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
Thanks,
Stefan
--
Stefan BethkeFon +49 151 14070811
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Am 14.03.2009 um 22:35 schrieb Julian Elischer:
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 14.03.2009 um 19:01 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I'm having some trouble configuring a dual-homed jail host,
running -current from about 4 weeks ago.
...
Is ther
Am 14.03.2009 um 19:01 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I'm having some trouble configuring a dual-homed jail host, running
-current from about 4 weeks ago.
...
Is there any documentation on how source addresses are selected? I
thought I remembered th
oute_openvpn="10.0.0.0/18 10.0.63.255"
jail_enable="YES"
jail_set_hostname_allow="NO"
jail_sysvipc_allow="YES"
jail_devfs_enable="YES"
jail_mount_enable="YES"
jail_list="foo bar baz"
iding which route (and thereby which
interface) a packet should traverse.
You will need to use IPFW, pf, or similiar to force packets
originating on your xl0's address (212.64.212.180) to go to the
router on that network instead of to the default routes gateway/
interface.
Stefan
want more specific hints, you should give us more details: how
are those two ISPs connected to your FreeBSD machine? Direct IP
network, PPPoE? Which connections specifically do you want routed
through which ISP?
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 34
The following reply was made to PR kern/102607; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Radim Kolar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/102607: [if_bridge] don't generate random L2 address
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 13:
The following reply was made to PR kern/102607; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/102607: [if_bridge] don't generate random L2 address
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:09:16 +0200
Here's my suggestion fo
:
+.Bd -literal -offset indent
+cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
+ifconfig_bridge0="link 12:34:56:78:9a:bc addm em0 addm em0 DHCP"
+ifconfig_em0="up"
+ifconfig_em1="up"
.Ed
.Pp
The bridge can tunnel Ethernet across an IP internet using the EtherIP
--
S
esses to the ifconfig man page,
explaining valid choices for LAAs. (I'll try to put together
something over the weekend.)
My 0,02 EUR,
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing l
nput: CHALLENGE (17
bytes from BRUN-0176-03-11)
Aug 24 06:11:10 diesel ppp[91690]: Phase: Chap Output: RESPONSE
(04022758623)
Aug 24 06:11:11 diesel ppp[91690]: Phase: Chap Input: SUCCESS
Aug 24 06:11:11 diesel ppp[91690]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> open
Aug 24 06:11:11 diesel ppp[91690]: Phas
entially a per-packet operation? You'd have to at
least check whether the rule is still in the appropriate slot each
time you reset the timer.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.
to connect via this method.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html
If you can show us your ISPs instructions for configuring a Windows
or Mac system, I'm certain we can help convert those for FreeBSD.
HTH,
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a single IP and a single certificate:
http://wiki.cacert.org/wiki/VhostTaskForce
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
In non-blocking mode, you must always be prepared to wait for data.
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
o any 6880-6889
xmit tun0
# default
${fwcmd} add 220 queue 2 tcp from any to any xmit tun0
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
n the path can not tell what the NAT'd packets
looke
like.
BTW, I've heared Windows-behind-NAT-people ;) are using http://
hamachi.cc
trick, however, I've never tried.
5/8 is reserved--for now. The software is binary-only.
For a better alternative, check out OpenVPN.
m1 works; after bringing em0 up, machine locks solid after 2 to 5
minutes.
--
Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
them disabled, it works fine for me on T-Mobile netowrks
in Germany, Austria and the US.
HTH,
Stefan
--
Stefan Bethke, Phone +49 170 346 0140
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send an
44 matches
Mail list logo