Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-24 Thread Sriram Gorti
Hi, On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/22/10 18:10, Sriram Gorti wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the fix. Tried it on XLR/XLS and the earlier tests pass &

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-22 Thread Sriram Gorti
Hi, On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/04/10 22:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> On 10/01/10 22:20, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In the following is an ob

Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-01 Thread Sriram Gorti
updated on SMP ? (The particular flavor of XLS that was used in the test had 4 cores with 4 h/w threads/core). I see that the tcp_reass function assumes some lock is taken but not sure if it is the per-socket or the global tcp lock. Any inputs on what I missed are most welcome.