Antoine Brodin wrote:
> I am looking at PR 137487, world broken WITHOUT_NETGRAPH.
> Is it reasonable to have MK_NETGRAPH=no enforce MK_ATM=no and MK_BLUETOOTH=no?
> The bluetooth stack is implemented using the netgraph framework. Some
> bluetooth userland tools include netgraph headers or use netg
Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:06:21PM -0400, Skip Ford wrote:
> > Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > > The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running
> > > FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59
> > > Usually there are 3,000
Igor Sysoev wrote:
> The TIME_WAIT sockets suddenly started to grow on a host running
> FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE, date=2009.09.06.23.59.59
> Usually there are 3,000-5,000 TIME_WAIT sockets on the host.
> However, today they stared to grow, have reached 110,000 sockets in hour
> and still remain on this l
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El d?a Saturday, January 10, 2009 a las 05:54:56AM -0500, Skip Ford escribi?:
> > Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > > What kind of software I could use in FreeBSD? There is some port
> > > net/rp-pppoe but the man pages speaks about incoming c
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> What kind of software I could use in FreeBSD? There is some port
> net/rp-pppoe but the man pages speaks about incoming connections?
> What else?
Are you having problems using ppp(8)? PPPoE has been just another
dialup connection for years. Example configurations are avai
Eugene M. Kim wrote:
[snip]
> Then, when a new address comes up (such as on a dynamically created L2TP
> tun(4) interface), BIND tries to listen on it, but fails because it is
> running setuid as bind:
>
> Dec 27 02:32:00 home named[1121]: listening on IPv4 interface tun0,
> 10.0.2.129#53
> Dec 2
