> tcp.established 86400s
>
> ^^ This should be 3600.
>
> Pierre
That's an interesting thought. Why would that matter?
Shawn
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send a
Hi All,
I've set up a load balanced FreeBSD router using outbound load balancing
as configured here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
There are one or two sites that this is causing problems with. Can anyone
suggest a rule that would force certain websites to go through certain
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> pfctl -v -s state
It's midnight here. There should be very little active traffic from
workstations at this hour. I was just about to head off to bed.
#pfctl -v -s state
No ALTQ support in kernel
ALTQ related functions disabled
all tcp 63
> Any error messages in dmesg output ?
> Significant changes in "netstat -m" output before and after ?
> The same for "pfctl -s all" output...
The box has been up for about 12 hours now. As a point of discussion here
is the output from netstat and pfctl in case anything obvious jumps out.
38
Hi Guys,
Here's a weird one... I set up FreeBSD 5.2 to act as a router. I used
the pf.conf script shown at:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
Everything works just fine. Traffic is appropriately load balanced and
things work as expected.
Strangely after a few hours something j
Sorry I meant to say FreeBSD 7.0 :)
> Hi Guys,
>
> Here's a weird one... I set up FreeBSD 5.2 to act as a router. I used
> the pf.conf script shown at:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outgoing
>
> Everything works just fine. Traffic is appropriately load balanced and
> things work as
