On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 February 2003 06:44 pm, Wes Peters wrote:
> = On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 08:42, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> = > Using two cards, were one works fine is against aesthetics :-)
> = > That's my primary reason, although there are only two slots left in
The 4.7 release notes have:
"The tcp(4) protocol now has the ability to dynamically limit the
send-side window to maximize bandwidth and minimize round trip times. The
feature can be enabled via the net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable sysctl."
I recall being interested in this back when it was being
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, July 2, 2002, "Scott Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm very interested in this type of product (meaning "Really small box
> > that's essentially a complete PC, without having to build an
> >
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 04:26:53AM -0700, Jon Mini wrote:
> > I'm probably speaking out of turn here (I have no idea what structure
> > you all are talking about), but a monodirectional ring can be safely
> > modified with a compare-and-exchange atomic
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, John Angelmo wrote:
> I was thinking of cunstructing a small routerbox in my sparetime. Now
> since FreeBSD is my choise of OS i was thinking of a small box silent
> box.
>
> So how can I combine speed, size, silence and price?
I'm very interested in this type of product (mea
Background: I'm working on an intelligent Apache-based proxy server for
backend servers running a custom Apache module. The server does some
inspection of the incoming request to determine how to direct it, and
passes the reseponse directly back to the client. Thus, I'd like to be
able to set th