Re: Pim6sd daemon and global addresses

2008-05-01 Thread SUZUKI, Shinsuke
lways so obvious, pim6sd requires a global unicast address. > Second: is there a way to prevent the pim6sd daemon to send the PIM > hello messages, which it does regularly ? Please specify the following command in your pim6sd.conf, where xxx is the interface name you want to disable PIM-S

Re: IPv6 IOL certification?

2006-11-09 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
tp://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/sys/netinet6/icmp6.c.diff?r1=1.410;r2=1.411 http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb2.cgi/kame/kame/sys/netinet6/in6.c.diff?r1=1.402;r2=1.403 Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.or

Re: Problems under test of IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-2

2006-10-25 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
keep the change after > reboot. However, no DAD appear after I disable auto-negotiation. I > wander whether the way is wrong. I think you have to explicitly specify a link-local address, since net.inet6.ip6.auto_linklocal is set to 0. (as far as I see from your rc.conf, there's no suc

Re: Problems under test of IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-2

2006-10-18 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
ocal address after the auto-negotiation has been completely finished or - disable auto-negotiation or (to make all the freebsd users happy:-)) - hack the device driver to make IFF_UP on after the hardware is ready to send a packet Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Where is pim6dd and pim6sd in FreeBSD6.1?

2006-10-17 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
ble in the ports collection as net/pim6dd and net/pim6sd. > I can find the ports of pim6dd and pim6sd in FreeBSD 5.4, but none > in FreeBSD 6.1. Do you know where is pim6dd and pim6sd in > FreeBSD6.1? they're moved to net/mcast-tools Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project

Re: Can't delete v6 addy from gif0

2006-02-10 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
7ad::9 delete As is written in man ifconfig, "delete" (alias of "-alias") should appear after the address argument. Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Conclusion of KAME

2005-11-08 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
(Apologize for possible duplicate messages) Dear all, This is an important announcement from the KAME project. I'm SUZUKI, Shinsuke, sending this message on behalf of the project. It is our pleasure to announce that the KAME project has achieved its project mission, which was to establis

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-31 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
Hello, > On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:54:09 -0600 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said: > > Could you please try the following patch? > > http://www.kame.net/~suz/in6.c.diff.releng60 > > Been running with your patch all day and so far no problems whatsoever. > I can run ifconfig over

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-30 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
Hello Craig, >>>>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:22:08 +0900 >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](SUZUKI Shinsuke) said: > Here's the list of possible solutions. I'm now working on the > second one. But if you need an immediately solution for > 6.0-RELEASE, pleas

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-29 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
x27;s a KAME code implementing this. I'm now porting it, but it'll take some time to check its behavior (a day or two)... Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.fre

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-28 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
Hello Craig, >>>>> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:18:33 +0900 >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](SUZUKI Shinsuke) said: > > Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different computers attached to the same > > network (em0 on the second computer isn't connected to anything righ

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-28 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:09:01 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Craig Boston) said: > > In your configuration, em0 and em1 have the same prefix. > > Is it intentionally configured? > > #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner... > > Yes, but em0 and em1 are on different co

Re: 6.0-RC1 IPv6 losing local subnet route

2005-10-27 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
ally configured? #normally, IPv6 operator does not assign prefix in such manner... Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ipv6 panic in 6.0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: kern/85780: 'panic: bogus refcnt 0' in routing/ipv6])

2005-09-27 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
one_create/detach/destory(), and none of them seems to be called according to the description in the PR. (rtexpunge() in route.c also has this message, but it is commented out by "if 0", so it is not the cause of this message) Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project _

Re: SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it withsomething simpler

2004-10-25 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
h trivial bugs can be fixed easily in -current. (I myself haven't tested SCTP very well, so I cannot comment on its stability itself. But at least, SCTP does not seem to affect the behavior of other protocols) Thanks and sorry if you feel my previous comments were insulting... S

SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler

2004-10-22 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
So I'm not still sure if SCTP in KAME is complete and stable enough to merge into -current. (If someone can contribute to this kind of evaluation, it's quite appreciated, of course!) Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ KAME Project ___ [EMAIL PROT

Re: if_stf bug/feature

2004-05-06 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
atic" tunnel, some site provides a tool to automatically configure gif tunnel even behind NAT (e.g. ports/net/freenet6) - enable 6to4 on your NAT-box and let it advertise an IPv6 prefix (if not possible, please as

Re: pim6sd

2004-04-28 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:56:03 + > [EMAIL PROTECTED]("Mónica Domingues") said: >My router with FreeBSD 4.9 and kame snap kit. At this pc I have >pim6sd runing. And a host with FreeBSD4.9 and kame snap kit. It's a KAME-SNAP specific question. You have to do the following thr

Re: IGMPv3 (was Re: pim6sd)

2004-04-28 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:49:52 -0700 > [EMAIL PROTECTED](Andrew Swan) said: > as of last fall, kame was waiting for the igmpv3 sockets api to > be published as an rfc (it was an internet-draft at the time) to > merge igmpv3 into the core bsd distributions. > (see http://www.kame.net/roadm

Re: pim6sd configuration

2004-04-20 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
vere error info in /var/log/pim6sd.log. So you should raed this file to know what happens. Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ Hitachi / KAME Project ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Multicast IPv6, socket,

2004-03-18 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
to mcastsend (kame/kame/mcastsend), available in KAME SNAP Tarball. It does quite the same thing as your program. (it's not merged into freebsd-current yet, since it's normally a debugging tool for developers. If there's a strong request, I'm willing to merge it into -curren

Re: IPv6 autoconfiguration on a multihomed site

2003-10-02 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
10:100b::3, 2001:800:40:2471::3 Address of Router2: 2001:720:410:100b::4, 2001:800:40:2471::4 If you cannot still ping from PC to Router1 although it works, please show me the routing tables of both routers. Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke @ Hitachi / KAME Project _

Questions on ip_output.c's patch for FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip

2002-04-18 Thread SUZUKI Shinsuke
a patch for 5-current, but it's not so difficult to modify it for 4-stable and 4.5-release branch) Thanks, SUZUKI, Shinsuke / KAME Project Index: ip_output.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_outp