On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:39:38PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> I just compiled and installed a kernel with the new nfe(4) driver and
> DEVICE_POLLING enabled. Below are the results of some scp(1) transfers:
scp(1) isn't really the best way to test this; the XBOX CPU cannot
satisfy a 100mbit link u
Hi people,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 09:43:14PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> http://g-rave.nl/junk/freebsd-icsphy.diff
I'll take a look at this; I've noticed mostly timeouts on the nfe(4)
interface which could be attributed to this fact.
Thank you for your work; whenever I find a working IDE
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 08:31:56AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:47:54PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote..
> > I am getting a panic with a GENERIC with all non-available hardware
> > drivers stripped out with "device fddi" and "device fpa" in the config.
> > The only things
> backplane bus to handle that kinda bandwidth, whereas a consumer
> grade motherboard where the GB NIC is hanging off the PCI bus rather
> than being integrated into the northbridge is not going to do nearly
> so well.
Indeed, this is why I specifically said: desktop NIC's... my onboard
bge
> However, there is little point to trying to use GB and jumbo frames
> on a NIC in a standard 33MHz PCI slot; unless you have PCI Express
> slots available or a GB card integrated with the chipset, the PCI bus
> will bottleneck the system from doing much better than a 100Mbs NIC
> would pe
Hello,
>
> so, how limit using IPFW any other atempts to establish ftp session number
> 4,5 etc... so we could use maximum 3sessions/1 IPaddrs?
Have you considered looking at your FTP daemon's configuration? proftpd and
vsftpd provide nice facilities for the functionality you are looking
for.
I
