ts of length 10, 14, or 18); the driver logged
these and kept going.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
orted
a length of 10.
I'll try running my download test in a loop overnight and make sure
it doesn't crash.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
7;m willing to agree with Bosko that leaving out this code is a tem-
porary workaround, and not a true fix -- but do you think it might be
possible to take it out in -STABLE for now, until the problem is found?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
===
nd stress-tested it by downloading a large file over
a high-speed (1.3Mbit/sec) DSL line using a Compex NE2000-compatible
PCI NIC (ed0) as part of a bridge cluster. It crashed; see below for
a trace of the crash dump.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irewall code (ipfw or ipfilter, I don't really care
which) is finally integrated into the netgraph bridge code, will this
issue be taken into account?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ng OK now. The only remaining problem I'm aware of right
now (and it's a nuisance, but not a showstopping bug) is the "dueling
ARP reply" issue, where both interfaces on the bridge are advertising
themselves to my desktop system.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/
haven't a clue as to where this ARP entry came from. I couldn't find
anything in any configuration file on the bridge that might have added
it explicitly. I rebooted the bridge, and the ARP entry isn't there.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw
, internal i/f): 00:e0:29:68:64:3e
(pcn0, home net): 00:20:78:b1:74:4a
(ed0, home net): 00:80:48:c6:1d:ec
Desktop (171.66.188.117):00:48:54:6d:8d:4b
If you need any more info about my setup, let me know.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PRO
DSL
modem on the "external" side of the rl0/xl0 cluster. I did some tests
last night with "tcpdump" to confirm this. If absolutely necessary,
I could probably bring a laptop home from work, hook it up to the
external segment (alongside the DSL modem), and run "tcpdu
bridge using either of the bridge's
hardware addresses, of course -- but I still think the bridge
ought to send out its ARP replies =only= on the interface from
which the query came that the bridge is replying to.
FWIW, the desktop is still running 4.2-RELEASE.
Rich Wale
from work)
and I'll let you know what happens. Thanks.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
, the other internal)?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
ing which IPFIREWALL and IPFILTER can do, and
which I (possibly mis?)understood that NETGRAPH cannot currently do.
I thought you were saying that there was in fact a way to do this sort
of filtering on a netgraph bridge. If not, then the netgraph facility
won't help me any. Sorry if I misun
bridge rather
than a conventional router.
==> I don't need my firewall to pass any kind of non-IP packets,
other than ARP.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
rl0"
interface, but not the "xl0" interface. As I said, it doesn't seem to
have anything to do with which of the two bridged interfaces has the
IP address attached to it.
Does this help any?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
rface which is configured with the IP address) cannot get
an ARP reply from the bridge for the bridge's own hardware
address.
I clearly need to try configuring the bridge with the IP address
associated with the other interface, and see what happens. I'll let
people know what happ
interfaces at once.
I haven't tried this, and (for security reasons, see above), I really
don't want to try it.
> What happens when you assign the IP to xl0 instead of rl0?
Good question. I'll try that.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/rich
t ARP replies, but
only sporadically and unpredictably.)
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
e the past week, so when I'm done with
> some stuff for work I can try and track it down. Can you include
> a kernel config and dmesg output?
OK. See below.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
=
Julian Elischer wrote:
> try using netgraph bridging instead.
Can't do this until the netgraph code supports ipfirewall or ipfilter.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
f ARP packets anyway. I'm
trying to connect directly to the bridge machine -- but the bridge
is failing to respond to requests for its own hardware address on
its "rl0" interface.
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send
perfectly for me in all respects other
than ARP.
The "rl0" card in my bridge is identified as an "Accton MPX 5030/5038",
and I'm running it in 100baseTX full-duplex mode (connected to another
machine via a crossover cable).
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.w
ands on the other
machines to tell them the bridge's hardware address -- but I really
shouldn't have to do this.
Any ideas?
Rich Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.webcom.com/richw/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
23 matches
Mail list logo
