Re: RELENG_6 No buffer space available [udp stream]

2006-02-09 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
other option ? Thanks Ricardo A. Reis UNIFESP Unix and Network Admin write2 failed: No buffer space available ENOBUFS is the error returned when a process is sending packets faster than the transmitting interface can actually transmit them. It occurs when the interface send queue fills

RELENG_6 No buffer space available [udp stream]

2006-02-08 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
ocated to network (current/cache/total) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 11 calls to protocol drain routines Thanks Ricardo A. Reis UNIFESP Unix and Network Admin ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.or

Re: Bug in routing tables ?

2005-11-25 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
perfectly on freebsd and linux. Linux user I bet ;-) For FreeBSD you need: #route add -net 200.144.xx.xx -netmask 255.255.254.0 172.22.x.x Ricardo A. Reis UNIFESP Unix and Network Admin ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Bug in routing tables ?

2005-11-24 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
Hi Milan, I use route with /netmask[bits] GW, this work fine for me for severals years, I erred in never read route(8) :-( but this "136.16&0xac160181" is very strange for me, and for you ? On Thursday 24 November 2005 17:28, Ricardo A. Reis wrote: Hi all,

Bug in routing tables ?

2005-11-24 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
13407rl0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 46lo0 136.16&0xac160181 255.255.254.0 UGS 0 34rl0 ?? The question is this is a network bug? OBS: using /23 this work perfectly!! Ricar

Nat on last snapshot 6.0-Current

2005-06-14 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
.168.0.2:3996 -> 201.1.106.26:62184 -> 85.137.17.234:4662 ESTABLISHED:ESTABLISHED self tcp 192.168.0.2:3990 -> 201.1.106.26:50582 -> 62.21.108.248:35165 SYN_SENT:CLOS On the 192.168.0.2 ping work, telnet on :80 work ... but firefox and emule not work!!! Sorry for english