Since I have been receiving private reports on the test failures, I thought
I just post the test report as executed against the upcoming FreeBSD 9.0
release in my own setup, so you can see where the baseline is.
More test reports will be posted here.
http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/ct-fr
Hi,
I had mistaken Svatopluk Kraus for "pluknet", so my "Submitted by:"
lines are wrong
in my recent commits for the following PRs.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159601
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159602
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159603
The failures are seen in basic Neighbor Discovery and Address
Selection. The tests are
not posted any where, but I can forward the report to you private once verified.
--Qing
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Larry Baird wrote:
> In article <111911.24641.10834@localhost> you wrote:
>> I am hoping
I am hoping to get the documentation, along with more enhancements completed
within a month.
The main reason for this delay is because I am suspending RADIX_MPATH related
work at the moment, and focusing on fixing IPv6 code instead.
The FreeBSD IPv6 implementation in -CURRENT, stable/8 and stable
I have not been able to reproduce the crash based on the steps you outlined
in the bug. I do see there is a logic error in the "for" loop right above the
crashing point can trigger a crash. I am looking at your latest patch.
-- Qing
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
> D
Thank you Xin.
Let me have a look and see if there is an alternative.
-- Qing
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi, Bjoern,
>
> On 2010/07/02 01:39, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, Chao Shin wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>
>
> I was using csup to track RELEN_8_0 branch. Currently I'm syncing to
> RELENG_8.
>
> If I understood you right, after getting the sources for RELENG_8, I need to
> apply the patch and then rebuild world?
>
You only need to rebuild the kernel.
-- Qing
__
Have you seen this thread?
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-April/025128.html
Quite a few fixes have gone into the -current and RELENG_8 branches.
Please try sync-up to the latest code before applying the patch.
-- Qing
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Marin Atanasov wrot
Hi,
Does anyone set either of the following systl variables to 0?
net.link.ether.inet.useloopback
net.inet6.icmp6.nd6_useloopback
If so, would you mind letting me know your reasons?
Thanks,
-- Qing
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
>
> Qing (added to CC) is aware of the problem. Not sure how far
> off the fix is.
>
I am resuming the work on it, hoping to get it verified and
finalized in a day or so. Sorry about the delay.
-- Qing
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Right now I am also a bit leaning towards reintroducing
the RTF_LLINFO flag bit. This is mainly due to the recent
discovery of the "route" command issued with the
"-iface/-interface" option, which conflicts with the
way how "arp" and "ndp" is handled in the kernel.
I renamed this flag bit to RTF_
Hi All,
The arp-v2 changes have been committed into HEAD.
Please report problems to me and Kip Macy.
-- Qing
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-un
As you know the L2+L3 rewrite project (aka arp-v2) for
both ARP and ND6 has been active for quite some time now.
In a nutshell, the work removes the L2 tables (ARP and ND6)
from the L3 routing table. This redesign simplifies the
routing code and completely eliminates the route cloning
concept.
>
> i agree that the timing is a bit tight for inclusion, especially
> because the work dates back to 2004 if not before, and i think Qing
> Li took over development at least two years ago - not a great track
> record in terms of dedication to the work. I'd rather not
developers Suzuki Shinsuke, David Borman, Daniel Hartmeier,
Jeffrey Hsu, and George V. Neville-Neil for being our reviewers.
We hope this book could become another useful contribution to
the FreeBSD community.
Thank you.
-- Qing Li
Hi,
We recently published a book on the KAME implementation and
on IPv6 in general. We hope this book could help developers
gain better understanding of the KAME code on FreeBSD.
The book is titled "IPv6 Core Protocols Implementation" and
it is published by Morgan
I have a private patch that's based on radix_mpath for FreeBSD 5.4.
I believe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is working on a solution.
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webster, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:51 AM
To:
>
> No, it was an off the cuff comment during the discussion. We should,
> most likely, move to whatever is most current as our solution.
>
I see. I guess the decision also depends on how much others are
willing to make that switch.
Either way, you can count me in as a helper if you li
>
> from skipping through racoon-ml from time to time I think racoon got
> announced as 0xdead project and one should switch to ipsec-tools?
>
Right, I also read the announcement on the racoon ml on 4/21.
I'm assuming George was referring to updating racoon in ports
to a later version. Af
Hi,
I'd like to volunteer for
>
> Tasks to update FAST_IPSec
> Add IPv6 support (2-3 weeks)
>
unless someone else has already claimed ownership.
I can also help out on the racoon side so feel
free to put my name down on that list.
Thanks,
-- Qing
__
20 matches
Mail list logo
