On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:10:20PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> ifconfig em0.1 create
> ifconfig em0.2 create
> ifconfig em0.3 create
Is this 'shorthand' documented anywhere? I could not find it in man
ifconfig and man vlan at a brief glance/search.
Cheers, Peter
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
Hello,
with 6.0-BETA4 (from september 10th) if_tap and if_bridge cooperate
perfectly.
After upgrading to BETA5 my machine panics seconds after I ifconfig
bridge0 up.. I tested if_tap independently and it is fine; if_bridge
panics without if_tap too.
The error message is along the lines of 'unali
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:49:28AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On FreeBSD, we solve this issue by assigning the IPs to lo0. For
> Linux, this approach works equally well and is what the Linux Virtual
> Server documentation recommends.
Oops.. the docs I read were for Linux 2.0. The doc
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:37:59PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> OK, enabling bridge is useless unless you bridge a pair of interfaces :)
>
> But that ARP thing happens also with interfaces that are not part of
> the bridge! Even if the interfaces are ifconfiged NOARP.
This is not what I observe
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 03:34:10AM +0100, Gary Palmer wrote:
> There is another side effect, which comes into view with certain
> configurations behind load balancers. Foundry has an option (I believe
> called "DSR" for Direct Server Return) which just fiddles with the MAC
> address of the dest
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:06:19PM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> To me, it seems that FreeBSD does just that too once bridge is enabled.
'Enabling' bridging is a no-op.. However, when you -configure- a
couple of interfaces together in a bridge, they share this behaviour;
but this is correct as br
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 03:51:19PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> Does your network card support checksum offloading? Does disabling it change
> the situation?
Interfaces are vlanX on an fxp. As far as I know fxp doesn't do
checksum offloading. Setting LINK0 (load microcode for reducing
interrupt lo
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 12:39:53AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my FreeBSD/sparc64 5.4 router at home to 6-BETA2,
> without changing pf.conf. Since this upgrade, UDP packets redirected
> with pf's route-to feature get the wrong checksum.
This i
Hi,
I recently upgraded my FreeBSD/sparc64 5.4 router at home to 6-BETA2,
without changing pf.conf. Since this upgrade, UDP packets redirected
with pf's route-to feature get the wrong checksum.
My complete ruleset:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grep -v ^# /etc/pf.conf
ext_if="hme0" # replace with actual
