Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

2012-08-29 Thread Pete French
> Have you checked that Windows really did LACP in your case? Sounds like > it was no real hardware stack, so probably Windos just activated RSTP. > FreeBSD doesn't detect any LACP/RSTP configuration features, but windows > does with some NIC verndor's drivers. That is quite possible - I didnt set

Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

2012-08-29 Thread Pete French
> Link aggregation can never work with two separate switches! LACP and > static trunking require both sides to bundle the same trunk. which is > impossible for two separate switches. These switches had a port where you could connect them together and then configure each to know about the other swi

Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

2012-08-28 Thread Pete French
> No answer, so it seems that link aggregation doesn't really work in freebsd, > this may help others with the same problem... I used to use LCAP a lot - this was a few years ago, but the critical point was that it only worked if all the cables went to the same logcial switch. Using a pair of swit

Re: kern/149804: [icmp] [panic] ICMP redirect on causes "panic: rtqkill route really not free"

2010-09-17 Thread Pete French
The following reply was made to PR kern/149804; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pete French To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, petefre...@ticketswitch.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/149804: [icmp] [panic] ICMP redirect on causes "panic: rtqkill route really not free" Date: Fri, 17 Sep 201

Re: Another send of EM test change

2007-11-02 Thread Pete French
Thanks, that worked ifne, am just compiling them now to try... -pete. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
> Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version > that came thru not have both?? Nope, it's only got if_em.h in it - I just took a look at the actual mime stuff in the email and tere is only one attachment in the version I received. -pete. ___

Re: Test changes to em

2007-11-01 Thread Pete French
> You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big > enough that this seemed easier than a patch. Did you miss a file ? I nly see a new header file in here. Am keen to try this out though... -pcf. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-19 Thread Pete French
> Mine applied cleanly to sources from last Friday. O.K., that works (now I have the correct date in my supfile). Will give it a shot... -pete. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE

2007-03-19 Thread Pete French
> I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > RELENG_6_2): What dates stable is this relative to ? I am trying to apply your patch to a cvsup of stable pulled on the day/time you sent your email, but parts of it are failing for me unfortunately. I would like to test this as I

Re: ntp problems; am i the only one?

2002-04-15 Thread Pete French
> This might be a firewall-issue of the university, but then, even > "ntpdate -v box-next-to-me" gives the sames behaviour. Try giving the '-u' argument to ntpdate... I needed that to get through a firewall when I used ntpdate to set the clock on my boxes. > I would be glad to know if there is a