So please go ahead, give Marko that bit and let him commit this decent work!
Helge
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Julian Elischer
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 12:15 AM
> To: Marko Zec
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
From: Crist J. Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Helge Oldach wrote:
> > Nothing that works well and has noticeable exposure is useless. This
> > definitely has both. Not with FreeBSD, though. It does work with Windows
> > 2000 SP4, to put a name up... So i
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 27. August 2003 17:45
> To: Oldach, Helge
> Cc: hilman firmansyah; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Gif IPTunnel networkA-to-networkB not work
> Oldach, Helge wrote:
> > You must have the networks connected (
> From: hilman firmansyah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> NB : I still dont touch the IPSEC and encrypted section
> ,since in the fbsd
> handbooks said to make an encrypted section i must have the 2 networks
> connected. Is this right?
You must have the networks connected (on the public side), but wh
> I am no programmer, so forgive my ignorance in that respect, but why can't
a
> metric be used to differentiate routes to the same destination network
> within the routing table? I happened to be googling and found:
>
> http://daily.daemonnews.org/view_story.php3?story_id=3878
>
> which descr
> From: Bryce Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 18:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: freevrrp
>
> I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces
> for redundancy.
I would prefer a layer 2 based approach ("EtherChannel") instead because of
the mu
