At 2008-02-18 22:12:48+, Julian Elischer writes:
> Unless you actually want all your machines to be remotely
> accessible from the outside, you should probably just turn on
> NAT on the new ISP interface, turn off the old one, and be
> done with it.
The machines I'm interested in for these pu
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
> In response to Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
> > in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
> > temporary situ
, but packets
from address A2 to be sent via gateway G2.
How do I do this? Can I just have more than one default route? I'm
remote from the machine in question, so I don't want to tinker with
the default route until I'm sure of the answer.
Thanks in advanc
At 2003-08-15 14:15:00+, Lars Eggert writes:
> Nick Barnes wrote:
> ...
> > I can provide sources on request any time; once these things are a bit
> > more polished I will put them on the web.
>
> Interesting! Maybe turn them into a port once they're stable?
I&#x
At 2003-08-15 14:15:00+, Lars Eggert writes:
> Nick Barnes wrote:
> > Thanks for the reference. I had a look at arping. It works by sending
> > a broadcast ping to the specified MAC address (not to the broadcast
> > MAC). I note that FreeBSD machines do respond
At 2003-08-15 11:13:57+, I wrote:
> Next week I may spend the time to extend my "ethercount" program,
> using the "pingall" code and the guts of "arp -a", to report using IP
> addresses instead of MACs.
FYI, here are the relevant guts of "arp -na":
/* Usual BSD copyright notice goes here */
At 2003-08-13 15:43:51+, Lars Eggert writes:
> This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
>
> --ms070709090404010406080107
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Nick Barnes wrote:
>
At 2003-08-13 12:13:24+, Mitch Collinsworth writes:
>
> If you ping the broadcast addr you will (should) get a reply from
> all hosts. This will give you a full arp table that can be
> grep'd programatically. The only hitch is that it's possible for
> someone to put a firewall or other custo
07:e9:92:c0:76 -> 00:90:27:ed:3c:70: 18 2143
00:03:47:fa:fb:5b -> 00:02:b3:33:37:0f: 105 15832
00:02:b3:33:37:0f -> 00:03:47:fa:fb:5b: 98 115895
total: 775 347963
I would like to be able to report by IP address.
Yours,
Nick Barnes
At 2003-08-13 13:58:51+, Robert Watson writes:
>
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Nick Barnes wrote:
>
> > I have written a small utility for traffic volume monitoring on an
> > Ethernet segment. It uses libpcap to capture the ethernet header of
> > every packet and coun
10 matches
Mail list logo
