RE: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible?

2011-04-26 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of fbsdm...@dnswatch.com > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 3:24 PM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible? > > > On

RE: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible?

2011-04-25 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of fbsdm...@dnswatch.com > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:09 PM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible? > > > On

PR 140684 - Still Open

2010-01-05 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello: Per Miroslav we upgraded to 7.2 Stable and are experiencing the exact same issue upon soft reboot. The card will not pass traffic until the device is powered down and powered back on. This behavior has been confirmed on two identical pieces of hardware. Regards, Mike -- Michael K

Re: Wacky DHCP values that work in windows but not in FreeBSD

2009-10-12 Thread Michael K. Smith
On 10/12/09 4:21 PM, "Doug Barton" wrote: > Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- >>> n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Julian Elischer >>> Sent: Monday, Oc

RE: Wacky DHCP values that work in windows but not in FreeBSD

2009-10-12 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > n...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Julian Elischer > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 4:00 PM > To: Doug Barton > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Wacky DHCP values that work in windows but not in FreeBS

RE: native vlan

2009-08-24 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Well, in Cisco speak, the native vlan is untagged and used for management. So, all your customer traffic comes in tagged with various VLAN's and your management stuff remains untagged and localized to the switching infrastructure. So, I guess you would do it if you wanted to speak spanning tree (

RE: FreeBSD network failover

2008-12-16 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Gabe > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 6:14 AM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: FreeBSD network failover > > >Maybe try lagg(4) in Failover mode? > > On Tue, Dec

RE: bridging ath

2007-09-27 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:22 PM > To: Randy Bush > Cc: Michael K. Smith - Adhost; FreeBSD Net > Subject: Re: bridging ath > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 01:19:42PM -1000, Randy Bush

RE: bridging ath

2007-09-27 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
> > Andrew Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 04:07:00PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> current i386 thinkpad t41 > >> > >> ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1/8" > >> cloned_interfaces="bridge0" > >> ifconfig_bridge0="inet 192.168.0.3/24 addm em0 addm ath0 up" > >> ifconfig_em0="up" > >> ifconfi

RE: carp not setting interfaces

2007-04-16 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Ahh. See below. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Stremciuc > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:20 PM > To: Max Laier > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: carp not setting interfaces > > Hi Max, > > > > > Y

RE: carp not setting interfaces

2007-04-16 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Steven: Answer (not necessarily the correct one) below. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Stremciuc > Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:00 PM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: carp not setting interface

Re: [4.5-R]FTP Uploading Is Massively Broken....

2003-09-10 Thread Michael K. Smith
> net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery: 0 > net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize: 1 > net.inet.tcp.local_slowstart_flightsize: 4 > net.inet.tcp.newreno: 0 > I went through my settings and the only difference in the variables you posted was: net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 32768 You might try that to s

Re: IPv6 headaches

2003-09-02 Thread Michael K. Smith
f the endpoint that should be here. > && ifconfig fxp0 inet6 2001:618:456:: prefixlen 48 Interface prefixlen should always be 64 or more specific Mike -- Michael K. Smith NoaNet 206.219.7116 (work) 206.579.8360 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.noanet.net

RE: IPv6 headaches

2003-08-29 Thread Michael K. Smith
Do you have a default route for your IPv6 network? Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny Horne Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 3:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IPv6 headaches Hi all, Hope someone can clear this up for me. I'm t

Re: Lots of input errors...

2003-06-27 Thread Michael K. Smith
t of the time you won't see framing errors related to duplex mismatching. Also, although this sounds contrary to sane thinking about hard coding of duplex and speed, the Cisco will do better autosensing if you are using an Intel ethernet card on the server. I'm not sure why, but I

Re: Lots of input errors...

2003-06-27 Thread Michael K. Smith
>0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets >0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred >0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > _