On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:05:07PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Garrett Wollman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> The consensus when I asked seemed to be that VIMAGE+jail was the
> right combination to give every container its own private loopback
> interface, so I tried to build that. I noticed a few thi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:49:35PM + I heard the voice of
Matt Churchyard, and lo! it spake thus:
> > On 11 Feb 2015, at 17:38, Warren Block wrote:
> > ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.1.1/24
>
> Yeah I've been using that format in rc.conf for years. Quicker to
> type and looks tidy.
Ditto. Though
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:55:38AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Michael Sierchio, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> pkg_add -r ipsc
For another, there's a "cidrcalc" program installed by devel/libcidr
(full disclosure: of which I'm the author) that does similar things:
% cidrcalc -bs 10.80.128.35/27
Add
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:37:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> There is no symmetrical "me4" option which leads me to think that
> "me" matches only ipv4 and "me6" only ipv6.
I can't answer for the code, but as far as I could tell as a user
that's the case.
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:49:38PM +0400 I heard the voice of
Igor Zinovik, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs
> Coll
> ed01500 00:80:48:c6:a1:82 35885806 4 23583716 0
> 134590 ...
>
> So i have three questions:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:34:26PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Lee Johnston, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> We've just been allocated a /31 for a point-to-point over ethernet.
> Any idea if FreeBSD supports 31-bit prefixes as per RFC 3021?
I don't think it does (but that's not positive knowledge). Yo
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:57:13PM + I heard the voice of
Bruce M Simpson, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> This is a POLA violating 'let's move with the times' patch that gets
> rid of the special treatment of classful IPv4 network prefixes in
> 'netstat -rn' output. Comments please!
Please!
1.2.
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:54:06PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Brett Glass, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Also, more than once I've locked myself out of a machine when trying
> to restart NAT with a different configuration;
The trick I've adopted for this is to have allow rules for port 22
both direc
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:47:54AM -0600 I heard the voice of
Brett Glass, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> How can I replace just the functionality of natd without moving to
> an entirely new firewall? Can I still select which packets are
> routed to the NAT engine, and when this occurs during the proce
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:46:09PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Julian Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I'd been wondering why I was the first person to notice the problem.
Actually, I noticed it a while back (6 months or so? Something like
that...) when I tried to run pppctl from my workstation
[ Crossposting bcc'd; followup to -net ]
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 08:18:46PM + I heard the voice of
Carlos Silva aka |Danger_Man|, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I've set "ipfw add pipe 1 ip from any to any 80;ipfw pipe 1 config
> bw 2Kbyte/s" but ipfw don't limit the bw of the port 80.
Yes, it d
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:55:32PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Charles Swiger, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Nov 2, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Peter Gregorc wrote:
> >I've got 86.61.75.240/30
> >.241 is for BSD
> >.242 for WS1
> >.243 broadcast
> >So two are usable for outside usage, if NAT is disabled.
>
> S
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:00:33PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Oh, OK. So I removed every line with a # & all blank lines, leaving just
> ---
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> nameserver 194.221.32.6
> nameserver 194.221.87.2
> ---
> It didnt help.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian H. Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
> "Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> > > but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name
> > > `thin',
> &
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Julian Stacey, and lo! it spake thus:
[...]
> but though `tower' & `thin' are also OK with non fully qualified name `thin',
> running nslookup localy on `flat' now gives errors:
[...]
> /etc/resolv.conf has
> # domainberkli
On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 05:52:57PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Charlie Schluting, and lo! it spake thus:
> Hi :)
>
> /etc/rc.conf:
> ifconfig_xl0="ether 00:11:11:11:11:11"
> ifconfig_xl0="DHCP"
>
> The above doesn't work..
Because that's setting a variable. If you set a variable, then set it
to
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 04:29:52PM + I heard the voice of
Franz Klaus, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> The second method sounds best to me. I didn't find how to do it on
> handbook. I tried to run on proxy host:
> #arp -s 192.168.0.11 pub
> but that doesn't work. Any hint how can I do proxy arp?
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 06:26:56PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Erwane Breton, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > Well, I don't see the problem.
> > >
> > > My math says that that's .03% collision rate, which is so deep in the
> > > noise as to be practically zero. What do you _think_ it should be
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:51:43PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Erwane Breton, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> On my FreeBSD box
> Network interface status:
> Ipkts Ierrs IbytesOpkts Oerrs Obytes Coll
> 21852457 0 280187344 28530965 7 3906410421 8584
> Lot of collisio
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Nick Rogness, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > - Is it possible without kernel modifications? How?
>
> AFAIK, No. Your only 2 possiblities that I could think of would
> be to us
20 matches
Mail list logo
