can't disable capability 0x400 on a vlan interface

er, actually finding out what capability 0x400 refers to seems to be neigh on impossible. Regards, Matt Churchyard ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

RE: Vale port naming

c(dmat, dmamap, op); \ ^~ /usr/src/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h:151:11: note: forward declaration of 'struct em_buffer' struct em_buffer *txbuf = &txr->tx_buffers[nic_i]; Any ideas or am I trying to

RE: Vale port naming

> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:37:48PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:29:31AM +0000, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-net > > wrote: > > > From the little information I can find on the net it seems that valeX:Y > > > is the format for a

Vale port naming

hether that applies to just the first part of the whole thing. Can anyone clarify the valid format for a vale switch/port? Is there any length or character restriction on X & Y? Regards Matt Churchyard ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mai

RE: Invalid subnet masks

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:49:35PM + I heard the voice of Matt > Churchyard, and lo! it spake thus: > > > On 11 Feb 2015, at 17:38, Warren Block wrote: > > > ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.1.1/24 > > > > Yeah I've been using that format in rc.conf for y

Re: Invalid subnet masks

> On 11 Feb 2015, at 17:38, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015, Matt Churchyard wrote: >> >> Just been helping someone on the forums who appears to have configured their >> network interface incorrectly. It looks like they've assigned 250.250.250.

RE: Invalid subnet masks

On 2015-2-11, at 09:59, Matt Churchyard wrote: >> Just been helping someone on the forums who appears to have configured their >> network interface incorrectly. It looks like they've assigned 250.250.250.0 >> as the netmask. > that's not invalid. The netmask is

Invalid subnet masks

hy FreeBSD accepts this value as a netmask? I'm fairly well versed in IPv4, although not a real expert, but I see no reason why such a mask would be used. Testing on my Win8.1 workstation, it gets rejected telling me the mask must be contiguous (i.e. all 1's then 0's), as I wou

RE: Carp stuck in INIT (10.1-RC2)

: Freddie Cash [mailto:fjwc...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 October 2014 16:58 To: Matt Churchyard Subject: Re: Carp stuck in INIT You don't need the "up" keyword, and it definitely works with a /30 and a single IP. I use that at work. But the order of options does matter (IP first, CARP stu

RE: Carp stuck in INIT

g or not. Regards, Matt From: Sascha [mailto:kinzena...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 October 2014 10:25 To: Matt Churchyard; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Carp stuck in INIT Hi Matt thanks a lot for the help! Unfortunately the Forum was down before I could read the replies. But what you said makes sense

RE: Carp stuck in INIT

is possible in earlier versions that use the old carp system. (And configuration of the old carp is quite different) Regards, Matt Churchyard -- Hi Matt, I think I'm the user you try to help in the forum ;-). I had the same problem like you when doing the first tests with carp. The alias

Re: Carp stuck in INIT

Thanks for the reply I tried moving the IP address to the beginning of the ifconfig line but it still seems to show the same error on boot and refuses to leave INIT mode. This isn't critical as I'm just playing around with it at the moment. I'm using virtualbox to test with and a few 10.0-RELEA

Carp stuck in INIT

address, I'd expect it to work with a single /30 carp address) Regards, Matt Churchyard ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"