Re: CARP on backup doesn't relinquish MASTER

Rudy Rucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed that if I reboot a server that is the MASTER, the carp0 on > the BACKUP box goes into MASTER mode and stays that way -- even when > the real master machine has finished rebooting. Is this a desired > trait to prevent CARP from switching IPs out

Re: problem with routnig

Marko Zec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could it be tahat 192.168.1.1 doesn't have a route to 192.168.2.0/24? > > Marko Yes, that's it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] me stupid horse [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk

Re: problem with routnig

"Joost Bekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, September 27, 2006 16:08, Marko Lerota wrote: >> "Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>FreeBSD BOX >

Re: problem with routnig

"Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marko Lerota wrote: >> route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 -iface xl0" >> route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1" >> > Neither of these subn

problem with routnig

I have gateway machine that doesn't work. Here is a setup: rc.conf # defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" gateway_enable="YES" network_interfaces="xl0 fxp0" ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.1.70 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.2.

Re: IBM Blade HS20, BCM5704S

"Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > on every new release I try to install FBSD on a IBM Blade HS20 with > above Broadcom GB card - and always fail. :) > > I just would like to know if it *should* be possible to have a working > installation. I have no problem. Try to upgrade

Re: CARP broken in 6.1

dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Assigning an IP address to a CARP interface leads to the new route table > entry: > UH 0 0 carp0 Maybe this is OK? > and such error in /var/log/messages: > arp_rtrequest: bad gateway (!AF_LINK) > > Removing the entry manually seems to fix the issue. But I

Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem

_statd_enable="YES" It didn't help. Now cpu is like it should be, but BSD crashes twice a day with nothing in logs that I can find. I think RedHat clients or NetScreen firewall are the one to blame. -- Marko Lerota Sektor za nadzor i upravljanje OT - O

Re: nfsd and CPU/performance problem

Marko Lerota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND > 429 root 1 40 1204K 820K - 0 581:42 13.48% nfsd > 430 root 1 40 1204K 820K - 0 10:37 0.00% nfsd > &g

nfsd and CPU/performance problem

My nfs server is chewing to much CPU even when nobody writes to nfs partition. The clients are RHES4. I don't know much about nfs but I followed the steps in handbook. Look: last pid: 43588; load averages: 0.46, 0.77, 0.81 28 processes: 1 running, 27 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% n

redundant ethernet interfaces

I have two nic bge0 and bge0, and I would like them to have the same IP address in case that my redundant switch stop responding. Bridge is not an option, I tried with netgraph but I did not succeed. Does anyone have some solution? I followed the examples from google groups and I stuck with du