>On Friday 10 July 2009 08:29:01 Len Conrad wrote:
>> FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 14:37:25 UTC 2009
>> r...@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>>
>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.26-MHz 686-class
>>
uname -a
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0
kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
15 0xc040 97f830 kernel
21 0xc0d8 ff18 iscsi_initiator.ko
31 0xc0d9 6a2c4acpi.ko
iscontrol doesn't have -V version and strings doesn't find anything that looks
uname -a
FreeBSD xxx 7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0
kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
15 0xc040 97f830 kernel
21 0xc0d8 ff18 iscsi_initiator.ko
31 0xc0d9 6a2c4acpi.ko
iscontrol doesn't have -V version and strings doesn't find anything that looks
We have a windows mailserver that relays its outbound to a fbsd
gateway. We changed to a different fbsd gateway running 4.10. Windows
then began having trouble sending to 4.10. Windows "netstat -an"
shows dozens of lines like this:
source IP desitination IP
Just off the top of my head...
You mentioned the freebsd machine is the gateway. Do you have a firewall
on the host blocking connections from the windows machine?
a forgotten detail is that the windows machine sends just fine to the 4.10
gateway for a few minutes, but the time_wait inevitably b
We have a windows mailserver that relays its outbound to a fbsd
gateway. We changed to a different fbsd gateway running 4.10. Windows then
began having trouble sending to 4.10. Windows "netstat -an" shows dozens
of lines like this:
source IP desitination IP
> > o Would anybody be interested in my adding support for this beast's crypto
> > features to the fxp driver?
>
>Yes. :)
Is there ANY hardware encryption support in FreeBSD?
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com
4.4-20020101-STABLE with 5 nics
ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp1="inet 10.1.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp2="inet 192.168.253.59 netmask 255.255.255.0 media autoselect"
ifconfig_fxp3="inet 10.1.4.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 m
>I have two dns-servers at 200.198.77.34 and 200.198.77.35, and when
>querying it with the nslookup and dnsquery everything appears as normal.
when do recursive query to either, I get an answer. you should not allow
recursive queries except from your trusted ip's, for BIND8
acl mynets {ip_li
Is anybody using netgraph and multilink ppp (recommended by PHK) to
load-balance outgoing traffic over multiple (4 or more) T1's? stable?
efficient enough to push the T1's towards practial limits?
thanks
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for N
>My suggestion is to start using firewall rules or perhaps hook
>tcpwrappers such that it looks up incomming connections and
>checks them against RBL.
good idea, but I´m not a c programmer.
> Another suggestion is to call the
>ISPs or law enforcement offcials to report this continued
>harrass
A client has been receiving an attack on this mail gateway´s port 25 for 3
weeks. We increased the postfix SMTPD processes from 50 to 150, and the
hourly msg rejects jumped from 5000 to 15000, roughly. The source addresses
used by the attacker(s) are mostly in the various RBL bases, 100´s of t
>If it really is a lossy layer one issue, you are best off getting them to
>fix that.
We have no hopes that FT or it´s ADSL reseller will do anyting about
that. The reseller said "just turn on ip spoofing so your apps don´t die"
> Have a look at the speed touch and make sure its configured
Prior to installing in a customer site, we´ve been running a 4.3R and PPPoE
into a banal Alcatel ADSL bridge, "Home Speed" or somethting, in France as
LAN router/ipfilter firewall. All seems to be running well, but after very
long observation, we don´t like:
1. pinging from an LAN station to
>>There is no 3 minute blackout. The session is just closed. Change
>>lqrperiod if you want a shorter deconnexion.
>
>Merci bcp, so that´s where from the repeatable 6 x 30 seconds comes!! thanks
but
with ppp.conf having:
enable lqr
set lqr accept
set lqrperiod 3
we get:
Aug 20 15:51:11
> > ... for at least the reason that France Telecom (French-govt-protected
> > monopoly), God bless 'em, cripples their ADSL service by inserting 3
> minute
> > blackouts, at the next hop at end their end of the ADSL, link throughout
> > the day, (ping to next hop dead) to protect their exor
>WRT killing ppp, the best way is:
>
> killall ppp; killall -2 ppp
and the best works!
Our script now succeeds in bringing up PPP again.
Thanks
>WRT the PPPoE lockup problem, I'd love to get to the bottom of this
>(I can't reproduce it here). If anybody can give me an account on a
>m
We´re very happy with PPPoE into our cable modem
´cept the whole link isn´t reliable :
... for at least the reason that France Telecom (French-govt-protected
monopoly), God bless 'em, cripples their ADSL service by inserting 3 minute
blackouts, at the next hop at end their end of the ADSL,
>I need to put together a bridging packet filter.
Can someone confirm that there is no way in FreeBSD to bridge Ethernet and TR?
Len
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gat
> >question: is anyone working on the Intel Pro/100 S support in the
> >fxp driver? I have found Intel to distribute a Linux driver and
> >looking at the source code I found:
>
> I have contacted intel a couple of times, to different part of intel,
> for spec sheet for this partic
>Check the obvious. Your IP addresses, netmasks, routing table.
>Can you provide more info? ifconfig -au, netstat -rn, on the FreeBSD
>system. and sho ip route on your Cisco.
It was simple in fact. We had added some ipfilter rules on disk but
hadn't loaded them into memory until the reboot d
We have a Cisco 3620 and FreeBSD 3.1R connected by an Ethernet
crossover cable. Has been working fine for 14 months. A couple of
gigabytes traffic pass over the link each day with no errors, speed
is correct.
ifconfig looks cool
netstat -ib shows no collisions on the link
A couple of mont
>We have a FreeBSD 3.1R machine as our main router uplinking to a
>Cisco 3620 (back to back, no switch).
>
>All works well, and had for months. After a reboot of cisco and
>freebsd, all still works well, but we cannot ping cisco inside to
>fbsd outside (the back to back interfaces with x-over
We have a FreeBSD 3.1R machine as our main router uplinking to a
Cisco 3620 (back to back, no switch).
All works well, and had for months. After a reboot of cisco and
freebsd, all still works well, but we cannot ping cisco inside to
fbsd outside (the back to back interfaces with x-over cable),
Before you trash FBSD and BIND, I suggest you learn DNS, because
yours is a freakin mess:
DNS Expert
Detailed Report for litestep.org
11/12/00, 17:48, using the analysis setting "Normal"
25 matches
Mail list logo
