network\n",
inet_ntoa(((const struct sockaddr_in *)l3add
r)->sin_addr));
#endif
RTFREE_LOCKED(rt);
return (EINVAL);
}
}
--
------
network\n",
inet_ntoa(((const struct sockaddr_in *)l3add
r)->sin_addr));
#endif
RTFREE_LOCKED(rt);
return (EINVAL);
}
}
--
------
ng/failing?
Thanks for the information,
Larry
--
--------
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com
Also make sure kern.polling.idle_poll is enabled. By default it is
disabled. This makes a big difference in polling throughput.
Larry
--
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology
for the changes?
--
--------
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, F
s receiving lots of network traffic. Polling prevents live
lock.
Larry
--
----
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com | TEL 4
le to me.
Larry
--
----
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
Paul,
> Larry Baird wrote:
> >The man page for polling states:
> >kern.polling.idle_poll
> > Controls if polling is enabled in the idle loop. There are no
> > reasons (other than power saving or bugs in the scheduler's han-
> > dling of id
ugs in the scheduler's han-
dling of idle priority kernel threads) to disable this.
So why is it now disabled by default? Looking back through cvs the
change was made by Luigi way back in August of 2002.
--
-----
ad is trivial. (-:
Larry
--
----
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TEL 407-3
x27;ll email this patch to you within the next couple of days.
Larry
--
----
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: [EMAIL PR
T_IPSEC pacthes for FreeBSD 4,5,6.
Yvan did 7 and 8 by himself. Keeping up gets to be a pain after a while.
I do plan to look at the FreeBSD 7 patches soon, but it sure would be nice
to see it commited.
Larry
--
-----
ADB_X_EALG_AESCBC 12
Looking at NetBSD, they have the same definition as FreeBSD. It would
seem that this problem exists for both FreebSD and NetBSD. For what its
worth, Linux uses SADB_X_EALG_AESCBC.
--
Larry Baird
et up, I was wondering if
this was the step that was being left out. Glad to hear it was something
easy.
Larry
--
--------
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlan
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:07:58PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 9/15/06, Larry Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:43:38PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > > On 9/14/06, Larry Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > P
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:43:38PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 9/14/06, Larry Baird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please find attached two patches for adding FAST_IPSEC NAT-T support to
> > FreeBSD 6.x. The patch "freebsd6-fastipsec-natt.diff" is dependent
&g
7;ll make the time. Should have something in the next day or two.
Larry
--
--------
Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Larry
--
Larry Baird| http://www.gnatbox.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
in advance for your help.
--
----
Larry Baird
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
#include
#include
19 matches
Mail list logo
