Re: Sockets and changing IP addresses

2002-11-21 Thread Justin C. Walker
ria. A thought: An attempt to reconnect will succeed, given the scenario above, and ENETDOWN implies that the network is unavailable, so I don't think this is a good response. ECONNABORTED might be better (and EADDRNOTAVAIL isn't really germane). Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Cu

Re: socket buffers

2002-09-18 Thread Justin C. Walker
mbufs that can be sucked up by one direction for one socket. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics| It's not whether you win or lose...

Re: ephemeral port allocation - time for a change?

2002-03-19 Thread Justin C. Walker
g with this (high) range as the default since "1.0". Hasn't caused any problems that I know of (or, at least, that anyone's been able to pin on the change :-]). Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics| It's no

Re: icmp related question

2002-03-07 Thread Justin C. Walker
ll notice that the call to m_pullup() has returned NULL, which means that the mbuf has been freed already (or, in any case, at this point in the code, there is no mbuf to free, due to the assignment). Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Se

Re: FreeBSD TCP/IP relation to Mac OS/X?

2001-12-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
27;s a fair amount of work. Unless there is a strong interest in it, the best that could happen, I think, is that it sits in the ports section, gathering dust... Regards, Justin -- /~\ The ASCII Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-at-Large \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML / \ Email T

Re: FreeBSD TCP/IP relation to Mac OS/X?

2001-12-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
more info floating around on the darwin lists, and in the darwin repository. Regards, Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics| If you're not confused, | You're not paying attention *

Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup

2001-08-27 Thread Justin C . Walker
\ U \/ / hard at > work in > | / \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] +-->x USA\ a very > strange > | ( OZ)\___ ___ | country ! > +- X_.---._/presently in San Francisco \_/ \\ > v > > To Unsubscri

Re: natd, 2 NIC's, 2 Hubs, Something I'm missing?

2001-05-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any > > - Original Message - > From: "Justin C.Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2001 9:52 PM > S

Re: natd, 2 NIC's, 2 Hubs, Something I'm missing?

2001-05-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
netmask 0x broadcast 192.168.255.255 > inet6 fe80::280:c8ff:fee8:58fe%dc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > ether ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX > 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/

Re: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement

2001-05-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
with 'netperf' isn't exactly complete in its description of what UDP_RR does. The implication of the man page is that it complains if a request times out. Check the source is my advice. Regards, Justin --- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semant

Re: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement

2001-05-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
otocol? Regards, Justin --- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics| Director of Technology | It's not whether you win or lose... Nexsi Systems Corp.| It's whether *I* win or lose. 1959 Concourse Drive

Re: three nics, two networks, simple routing problem...

2001-04-18 Thread Justin C . Walker
| > xl1 > | > | > 10.30.1.15 FW - 10.20.15.1 LAN Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large * Institute for General Semantics | Director of Technology| Men are from Earth Nexsi Corp. | Women are from Earth 1959 Con

Re: strange arp packets!!!

2001-03-18 Thread Justin C . Walker
e is - assigning that address to an interface (which may inadvertently occur on something like "ifconfig IF up"). - sending or receiving a packet with that address in the IP header, which should only occur for BOOTP/DHCP client startup. Regards, Justin Jus

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-28 Thread Justin C . Walker
alias. Noone is giving >>>> reasons why. > > Exactly. I never got a good answer to this when I first stumbled upon > it, > and I still haven't. All I know is that this is the way it needs to be > done > in order for things to work properly. Hope this h

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
01, at 05:09 PM, Jonathan Graehl wrote: >> do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0x' since >> this is >> an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip >> correctly > > Why would this be? The two are nu