can use one and a different
> > socket uses the other? That makes sense.
> Correct.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 10:34 AM wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 18. Jul 2024, at 15:00, Junho Choi wrote:
> >>>
> >>&g
t; > real workload, which introduces noise. Soon I hope to have the
> > opportunity to repeat the experiment on an idle server in the same
> > environment.
> >
> > In conclusion, while we'd like to use BBR, we really can't until we
> > upgrade to 14.1, which hopefully will be soon. So in the meantime
> > we've switched all relevant servers from cubic to chd, and we'll
> > reevaluate BBR after the upgrade.
> Hi Alan,
>
> just to be clear: the version of BBR currently implemented is
> BBR version 1, which is known to be unfair in certain scenarios.
> Google is still working on BBR to address this problem and improve
> it in other aspects. But there is no RFC yet and the updates haven't
> been implemented yet in FreeBSD.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > [1]: https://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/wan-mon/thru-vs-loss.html
> >
> > -Alan
>
>
>
--
Junho Choi | https://saturnsoft.net
