The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: PseudoCylon
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock
Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free
panic
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:50:42 +0100
On Sat, Jan 22
The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: PseudoCylon
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock
Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free
panic
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:21:20 +0100
On Thu, Jan 20
The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: PseudoCylon
Cc: Juergen Lock , bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free
panic
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 22:14:04 +0100
On Sun, Jan 16
The following reply was made to PR kern/153938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: PseudoCylon
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de
Subject: Re: kern/153938: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free
panic
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:36:50 +0100
On
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:Juergen Lock
>Organization: me? organized??
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: [run] [panic] [patch] Workaround for use-after-free panic
>Severity:
>Priority:
>Category: kern
>Class: sw-bug
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/149185; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: Bernhard Schmidt
Cc: Alex Kozlov , bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
Juergen Lock , rpa...@freebsd.org,
Kevin Lo
Subject: Re: kern/149185: [rum] [panic] panic in rum(4) driver on 8.1-R
The following reply was made to PR kern/149185; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Juergen Lock
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/149185: [rum] [panic] panic in rum(4) driver on 8.1-R
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 22:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!
Regarding the 8.1
Hi!
Regarding the 8.1 if_rum(4) panics... I got a similar one, extracted
a dump and tried to gather some info for someone who knows the code:
The zero divide fault was because (apparently) rate was unitialized,
as is
((struct ieee80211_node *)
m->M_dat.MH.MH_pkthdr.rcvif)->ni_vap->iv
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:16:58AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> In article <4b09992f.1080...@shapeshifter.se> you write:
> >Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> >>> Doug Barton wrote:
> >>>> Is bridged networking for vbox supposed t
In article <4b09992f.1080...@shapeshifter.se> you write:
>Doug Barton wrote:
>> Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
Is bridged networking for vbox supposed to work on -current? It says
on the wiki that it does, but I tried it tonight and couldn't get it
to work.
10 matches
Mail list logo