On Nov 10, 2003, at 1:39 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Jonathan Mini wrote:
All in all I don't think it is worth adding this complexity.
I agree.
This is actually a small value for TCP connections which are being
used to forward messages, especially on gigabit links.
Heavily-intensiv
On Nov 9, 2003, at 2:47 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Jonathan Mini wrote:
On Nov 9, 2003, at 8:19 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
- DoS attack 2: make MSS very low on local side of connection
and send mny small packet to remote host. For every packet
(eg. 2 bytes payload) a sowakeup is
as if it might be worthwhile to add a delay to
the TF_NODELAY case for receive processing as well.
--
Jonathan Mini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freebsd.org
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To
