> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
> Skickat: den 13 oktober 2010 11:32
> Till: Jon Otterholm
> Kopia: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Ämne: Re: VPLS implementation
>
> > > Are there any plans or ongoing work to
Are there any plans or ongoing work to implement VPLS in the network
stack?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Private_LAN_Service
//JO
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscrib
Den 2010-03-23 19.36, skrev "Jon Otterholm"
:
>
>
>
> Den 2010-03-23 14.12, skrev "Ivan Voras" :
>
>> On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote:
>>>
>>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>> This machine is going to act as access-ro
Den 2010-03-23 14.12, skrev "Ivan Voras" :
> On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote:
>>
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>> This machine is going to act as access-router serving ~500
>>> FTTH-customers.
>>> About 500Mbit/s and 200kpps. The big i
Den 2010-03-17 10.12, skrev "Gilles WAGNER" :
> 2010/3/17 Andrew Snow
>
> Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
>>
>>> Way over the top for simple fw and dhcpd. but how much traffic will
>>> be involved?
>>> Investing in a good nics will return more then a pricey cpu and
>>> motherboard (eec mem is goo
Hi.
In the process to build a new router and want to choose the best possible
CPU for the job.
Narrowed it down to the following:
Intel Q9650 3,0Ghz
Intel i7-965/975 3,2Ghz/3,33Ghz
What would be the benefit from a Xeon?
Motherboard: Supermicro X8SBI-4LN.
RAM: 4GB
The router will be running IP
On 2009-12-11 20.23, "Mike Tancsa" wrote:
> At 11:33 AM 12/11/2009, David DeSimone wrote:
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>
>>> If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
>>> re-established.
>>
>> Since this is
On 2009-12-11 20.23, "Mike Tancsa" wrote:
> At 11:33 AM 12/11/2009, David DeSimone wrote:
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>>
>>> If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
>>> re-established.
>>
>> Since this is
11 dec 2009 kl. 17.34 skrev "David DeSimone" :
Jon Otterholm wrote:
If I restart racoon or wait approximately 30 min the connection is
re-established.
Since this is approximately ½of the phase 2 lifetime, you are proba
bly
running into lifetime negotiation issues, or
I have a site-to-site vpn between these two:
1. FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4, racoon, ipsec-tools-0.7.3
2. Symantec VPN 100, (also known as "Nexland Pro 800")
I have intermittent connection problems between these two and I can't seem
to identify what the problem is. I realize the complexity and challe
Doing some test of gred in dummynet. My ruleset consists of a number of
queues connected to the same pipe. Queues have different weight and I
want to make use of gred instead of taildrop.
Should i define gred on the queues or on the pipe? To me it seems
reasonable to set it on the pipe and let
On 2009-04-19 11.14, "Robert Watson" wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, Jon Otterholm wrote:
>
>> I have a router running 6.4R that does not forward packets if I disable
>> PROMISC on the interface. Hardware is a Dell PE with two Intel 82541EI
>> chipsets (if_e
Hi.
I have a router running 6.4R that does not forward packets if I disable
PROMISC on the interface.
Hardware is a Dell PE with two Intel 82541EI chipsets (if_em). I have a
number (~100) of vlan-interfaces on em0. Everything works as aexpected if I
turn on PROMISC on em0 but forwarding stops if I
On 2008-11-06 11.47, "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Nov-06 10:06:21 +0100, Jon Otterholm
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it possible to tweak CARP to use the virtual MAC in L2 header instead of
>> the physical interface MAC
Hi.
We have a situation where we want to use CARP in a TPSDA-network and got
some problems.
The master CARP router ARP response contains the correct virtual MAC but
uses the physical interface MAC in L2 header. This is OK for the client but
the switches in between the router and the client will
Hi.
Are there any plans to implement option carpdev to carp in FreeBSD?
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi.
Has anyone got a solution to the rdr-problem when using PF together with
Dummynet/IPFW?
I found this thread from 2006 which describes the problem in detail:
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2006-07/msg00048.html
//Jon
___
fre
Hi.
I was wondering about the possibility of adding support for QinQ
("Double tagged frames" / "Nested vlans"). Attached is a patch against
-STABLE to add this support. I have not tested this but was told it
should work.
Would it be possible to get this into CURRENT?
//Jon
--- if_vlan.c.orig
Hi.
Does anyone know if it is possible to put a transparent bridge on a
vlan-trunk?
A working solution is to create a bridge for each vlan, but I would
prefer to have one bridge instead of several hundreds of them.
Is this doable?
In my lab environment I use a dual em(4) nic.
What would the dr
Hi.
I get "Device busy" when trying to change VLAN-id on a sub-if to em0:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# ifconfig vlan100 vlan 100 vlandev em0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Device busy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/user]# dmesg | grep em0
em0: port
0x4000-0x401f mem 0xee20-0xee21 irq 16 at device
Hi.
It seems that filtering on member interfaces are a bit buggy at the moment.
For testing I tried to use the following 3 rules to block traffic using PF:
The following works and blocks traffic:
block log quick on bridge0 from xx.xx.xx.xx to any
The following does not work:
block log quick on
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Jon Otterholm wrote:
I have a problem with proxy-arp entries.
If I add an arp-entry:
arp -s $hostip $routermac permanent pub only
the router sends an arp and replies to it's own arp like:
15:40:02.074419 arp who-has $hostip tell $hostip
Hi.
I have a problem with proxy-arp entries.
If I add an arp-entry:
arp -s $hostip $routermac permanent pub only
the router sends an arp and replies to it's own arp like:
15:40:02.074419 arp who-has $hostip tell $hostip
15:40:02.074663 arp reply $hostip is-at $routermac (oui Unknown)
This is
I'm havinf trouble sending packets to the ethernet broadcast address on
an if_bridge. It seems as if the onley packets sent from my router to
ethernet broadcast is arp. I have the following conf:
bridge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet x.x.x.x netmask 0xff80 broadcast x.x.x.x
ether
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Mar-21 22:08:06 +0100, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did not mention earlier that all if's are vlan-based sub-intefaces. It
seems that if I move admin-if's on my routers to a different physical if
than the one with the default route
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Jon Otterholm wrote:
When setting net.inet.ip.redirect=0 on my routers, the icmp-redirects
disappear, but instead I get a large amount of ICMP-time-exceed
from my
routers.
The information you've provided strongly suggests either pro
Hi.
I have some strange netproblems where my FreeBSD-routers sends
icmp-redirects/time-exceeds to my surveillance machine.
Basically I have a admin-net where all routers and switches are
connected. On this net I have a nagios-machine for surveillance (running
FreeBSD). Sometimes when my Nagios s
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface.
Anyone
>> else with th
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jon Otterholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface. Anyone
else with the same problem? I´m running 6.2-RELEASE.
Would you please give a bit more detail.
Jack
Here comes some info:
uname -a
F
Hi.
I have trouble with high latency on my new X60 with em-interface. Anyone
else with the same problem? I´m running 6.2-RELEASE.
//Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, sen
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:15:13PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Hi.
I have a bridge setup with a number of vlan IF's as members. After a
while traffic destined for one member IF are sent to all member IF's.
From man if_bridge:
A bridge works
Hi.
I have a bridge setup with a number of vlan IF's as members. After a
while traffic destined for one member IF are sent to all member IF's.
From man if_bridge:
A bridge works like a hub, forwarding traffic from one interface to
another. Multicast and broadcast packets are always f
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 04:23:07PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:30:21AM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote:
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Jon Otterholm wrote
Hi.
According to man if_bridge one could filter L2-traffic with ipfw:
From man if_bridge:
ARP and REVARP packets are forwarded without being filtered and others
that are not IP nor IPv6 packets are not forwarded when pfil_onlyip is
enabled. IPFW can filter Ethernet types using mac-t
Hello.
I am trying to limit arp-broadcast between member-IF on a bridge
(if_bridge) with no luck.
I have the following sysctls set:
net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 1
I am using PF for filtering - do I have to use IPFW to limit
arp-b
Hi.
I am searching for a BSD-based CNR replacement. CNR (Cisco Network
Registrar) is basicly a DHCP server that puts IF-routes on a router when
a client has leased an IP-address. When the lease expires the IF-route
is removed from the router.
This functionality together with IP-less VLAN-IF'
Hi.
I am designing a new network and one way to go is to configure a router
based on FreeBSD with one IF/customer. This would mean around 1000
VLAN-IF's/router - would this work? Do you see any problems with this?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
Hi.
Has anyone information about the sysctl "net.link.ether.inet.proxyall" ?
Is this a global ARP-Proxy? Does it apply on a bridge or if_bridge?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To un
Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Good day,
We are trying to reorganize our local area network and I need some
tips on how you are managing your own lan...
We have a vanilla pc router with interface facing our private lan
and interface facing the Internet.
One pr
Hi!
I want to set up a DHCP-server for a number of subnets. My current
router (Cisco) has a dhcp-relay function (ip helper) to put on each if
in the router to make it answer and forward requests to the dhcp-server.
I am having trouble to get isc-dhcp-server to start up without a
subnet-decla
Hi!
What is there to gain in performance choosing AMD64 on a Dell PE1850
(Xeon EMT64) when used as router?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
I think they do that when using standard 802.1Q, but for some reason
theey don't when running QinQ...
/Jon
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 13:00 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:45:44PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > The reason why I have to proxy-arp mac between VLA
000, Brian Candler wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:52:03PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > > > Scenario#1:
> > > > -I have a range of ip's, for example 215.10.10.0 - 215.10.10.255.
> > > > -I want to distrubute theese ip's to my custome
her if" acting as
gateway, distrute IP's via DHCP (ISC?) I could reduce the number of IP's
and administration when adding new customers.
Anyone with a souloution or revelation?
/Jon
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:23 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 04:06:03PM +0100
The linux-soloution you are describeing is exactly what I want to do.
Not a big fan of Linux though. I will have to wait for this to be ported
to BSD. Anyone with info if this is being done?
/Jon
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 14:57 +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi, Jon, Brian,
>
> > That depends...
>
Hi!
I have a router up and running but it is vital to our production all the time
so the tests cannot have any bad affects on my production...
IOS Version: Version 12.3(8)T3 (With firewall feature set)
Hardware: 7301
I have a bunch of FreeBSD's connected to various subnets on the Cisco router.
understand why Alcatel has put this limitaion in their DSLAM's.
Their answer is that it prevents spoofing. I would accept this as a
feature but not as a limitation...
/J
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 13:39 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:25:07PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
>
src to its own
mac.
I hope this makes it clear.
/J
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 12:49 +, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Jon Otterholm wrote:
> > I want to create a bridge-interface (if_bridge) with a bunch (500+) of
> > sub-interfaces (vlan) as memb
Hi!
I wonder if anyone have a soloution to my problem...
I want to create a bridge-interface (if_bridge) with a bunch (500+) of
sub-interfaces (vlan) as members. All members of the bridge should be
able to "talk" to each other but MAC-addresses must be isolated to their
"own" vlan. My thought is
Hi.
Does anyone know if if_bridge supports vlan-interfaces?
/Jon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
50 matches
Mail list logo
