Hi,
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 08:47, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> # cat /dev/urandom | ssh root@host 'cat > /dev/null'
>
> I use the above ssh command over a high-BDP WAN link (80 ms @ 100 Mbps).
> tcpdump shows I am TCP window limited to 64 KBytes (yielding 5 Mbps). iperf
> with default
Hi,
I'm looking to upgrade a frame relay connection, currently implemented in a
Soekris box with a Sangoma A101 card, running 5.x and Sangoma's Wanpipe.
Sangoma seem to have ditched FreeBSD support for Wanpipe, and I can't see a
driver in FreeBSD 9.
I'm looking at using ng_frame_relay. Does an
st need to know if it fixes your ESB2 problem, but sanity testing on
BOTH drivers
would be most appreciated. I would really like this checked into 7.1 ASAP.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Jan Mikkelsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Jack,
Thanks
Hi Jack,
Thanks for the reply.
Is there a workaround, or something I can merge myself? If not, any idea on
when it might make it in?
Thanks,
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Vogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2008 4:32 AM
> To: Jan Mi
There is no management card in this particular machine, and em0 on the same
motherboard is fine. I can see a few similar problems in the archives, but
I don't see a definitive solution. The same machine runs fine with 6.3-p1.
Dmesg below.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Jan Mikkelsen
Copyrig
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking using either Sangoma cards or the Tahoe Group cards for
> > connections to a frame relay network (Telstra in Australia,
> for what it's
> > worth).
> >
> >
hives, people seem generally happy with Sangoma, but
I can't find much on the Tahoe cards and FreeBSD. The software for the
Tahoe cards is significantly simpler than the Sangoma Wanpipe stuff.
What are the general experiences of these cards? Is anyone actually using
the Tahoe cards?
Thanks,
Jan Mik
