Thanks. Is there a specific C API I can use to call this?
On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 9/23/13 11:55 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to learn building a VPN-type application on FreeBSD and I'm
>&g
Hi folks,
I'm trying to learn building a VPN-type application on FreeBSD and I'm
currently stuck at trying to route packets to outgoing interface.
I've managed to push/pop IP packets in a tun(4) interface but now that I can
read the inner packet header, I need to route the payload out of the bo
On Mar 11, 2013, at 4:18 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 11.03.2013 08:52, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm on 9.0-RELEASE-p3 and have had a number of instances where my igb0
>> network connectivity locked up under heavy load.
>
> This probl
Hi,
I'm on 9.0-RELEASE-p3 and have had a number of instances where my igb0 network
connectivity locked up under heavy load.
I've had another em1 device which I used for side-band access which does not
have as much load as my primary igb0 device.
I've read previous cases of this but can't seem
Hi,
What's the internal difference between these two ioctl socket flags? I've
looked at sockio.h and notice that they refer to different identifiers.
I've created gif(4) via both flags and they both seem to work.
Why prefer one over the other?
ihsan
Hi,
I've been trying to obtain gif tunnel addresses via getifaddrs() but I've not
been able to. The tunnel addresses can be inet/inet6 depending on the scenario.
I can however get the inet/inet6 address of the interface.
Is there a way to get them?
Also looking at if_gif.c, I notice that there
orwarding could verify that there is no problem with it enabled I'd
> be happy
> to change it to be on by default.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Just curious is there a r
Hi folks,
Just curious is there a reason why LRO isn't turned on by default for igb(4)
like for other capabilities?
I have a couple of 82575EB igb devices and LRO had to be turned on manually.
Thanks.___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 21:16, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> While trying to poke around my mbuf stats, I ran across the following error
>> message.
>>
>> ihsan@sv01:~ $ netstat -m
>> netstat: memstat_sysctl_all: T
Hi folks,
While trying to poke around my mbuf stats, I ran across the following error
message.
ihsan@sv01:~ $ netstat -m
netstat: memstat_sysctl_all: Too many CPUs
It's an E3-1230 CPU on a Supermicro X9SCM-F with 4G RAM.
I'm on 9.0-RELEASE.
Has anybody encountered this before?
_
The following reply was made to PR kern/147824; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/147824: [msk]: watchdog timeouts
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:14:13 +0800
Hi,
I believe PR 116853 is related to this.
--
Thank you
The following reply was made to PR kern/147824; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, d...@edarb.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/147824: [msk]: watchdog timeouts
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:29:09 +0800
--0015174c0fe2fb030f048e091f88
Content-Type: text
12 matches
Mail list logo