On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:16:20PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 06:04:47PM +0800, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'd like to know your opinion about this patch
> >
> > http://www.morning.ru/~poige/patchz
re system (some simple sysctl's), without being forced into
> setting things you don't want to when you only have a few "modes" of
> operation.
this refers to a host(router)-itself protection, IMHO...
> After you do that, this filtering would actually be a fairly
>
to u_int64_t, and do
any other extensions. For now I decided just to wrote something like a
draft, test it (it seems to be working ;), and asking you, people, for your
comments/ideas on it.
P.S. A bit more info on this patch is at http://www.morning.ru/~poige/patchzone/
--
Igor M Podlesny a.k.a. Poige
ht
el between them... And this is
quite easy to set up...
> We're breaking the standard with IPSTEALTH anyway, so to my mind the
> best idea is to avoid spoiling the system code too much.
>> The patch looks OK for me.
> All right, if anyone else feels committing that patch of mine
