Re: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Jon Noack wrote: > Henry Su wrote: > > You can configure both NIC as /32. You also need proxy arp installed and > > listen on both NIC. Then the traffic should be able to follow between two > > NICs. Since Proxy ARP always answers its MAC to client

RE: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question

You can configure both NIC as /32. You also need proxy arp installed and listen on both NIC. Then the traffic should be able to follow between two NICs. Since Proxy ARP always answers its MAC to clients, so the clients can always send traffic to em1 or em0. Based on client's mac entry in the ARP ta

RE: need help

You can google it, there're many articles. Breifly answer your question: 1. Compile kernel to support ipfw (firewall). 2. Edit /etc/sysctl.conf add "net.inet.ip.forwarding=1" for routing. Good luck. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of angelito m

RE: VLAN questions

No, we do not have this problem. If it works on your LAN, it should work on Internet too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jack xiao Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLAN questions Hi, I set up VLAN

Re: provide packet header details to a user program for authentication

Hi, Julian: Do you know this code in ip_fw.c? #define BRIDGED (cookie == &bridgeCookie) hlen = ip->ip_hl << 2; Is this cause bridging fwd or divert problem? If so, how can we change it for bridging ipfw fwd or divert? Thanks. ****** Henry Su

provide packet header details to a user program for authentication

Is it possible to use ipfw provide packet header details to a user program for authentication? Any clue will be greatly appreciated. ** Henry Su * NTT MCL * ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the b

RE: socket call in the kernel

? __ ___ | |crossover cable | | |test1|>| test2(ipfw,proxy)|-->router->Internet |_| |__| -Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:59 PM To: Henry Su C

RE: socket call in the kernel

Hi, Julian: Could you please give me some code example for using the 'ksocket' node to open 'in kernel' sockets? Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Elischer Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:08 PM To:

RE: Why is my ipfw(8) ``fwd'' rule to redirect a service to another machine not working?

I tried localhost, it is an issue for me. It's 4.3 freebSD. Is this a bug? -Original Message- From: Crist J . Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 11:19 PM To: Henry Su Cc: Julian Elischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Why is my ipfw(8) ``fwd'

RE: socket call in the kernel

Same thing, it only works for telneting to test2:80 for test1. -Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:31 PM To: Henry Su Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: socket call in the kernel put the forward rule as rule 50 and

Why is my ipfw(8) ``fwd'' rule to redirect a service to another machine not working?

http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/faq/09.20.shtml Is there a way to configure your machine not drop these packets? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

RE: socket call in the kernel

Hi, Julian: Here's all the rules that I am using: [17:13:59][root@test2:~]$ ipfw show 001000 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 002000 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 003000 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 004000 0 allow udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0 00500

RE: socket call in the kernel

** Henry Su * NTT MCL * ** On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Henry Su wrote: > > > Thanks a lot Julian. Please let me know if u need more info. > > > > > > My goal is

RE: socket call in the kernel

Thanks a lot Julian. Please let me know if u need more info. My goal is using test2 as authentication server, when http request pass through test2 box, test2 will redirect to an authentication url on itself. __ ___ | |crossover cable |

RE: socket call in the kernel

do it. It has next_hop for fwd. I do not know how to do packet manupunation in ip_fw.c's chk func. Thanks a lot. ****** Henry Su * NTT MCL * ** On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > is your server binding to 216.115.102.75? > if you

RE: socket call in the kernel

et can not be received at port 8800. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Elischer Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:08 PM To: Henry Su Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: socket call in the kernel On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, H

RE: socket call in the kernel

Behalf Of Julian Elischer Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:08 PM To: Henry Su Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: socket call in the kernel I have two answers: 1/ Use ipfw add NNN fwd localhost,8001 [deny criteria] to make the packet that is denied go to a default server listenning on

RE: socket call in the kernel

s, buffer, BUFSIZ)) > 0) write(1, buffer, bytes); */ } } /* end debug */ return(IP_FW_PORT_DENY_FLAG); -Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:59 PM To: Henry Su Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj

socket call in the kernel

rnel level? If not, how can I accomplish socket communication in the kernel level? Thanks. ---- Henry Su NTT Multimedia Communications Laboratories, Inc. 250 Cambridge Avenue Suite 300 Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA (PST:UTC -8H) Tel: +1 650 833 3652 F