Re: SACK (and older TCP stack) availability?

, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:54:20AM +, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > > > > > I tracked a thread from Aug 2001 in which Harkirat Singh announced his > > > > SACK implementation. But, this thread seems to have ended prematurely and

TCP Zero Copy

Hello! Does FreeBSD 4.3/4.4 supports TCP Zero copy? If there is some patch available then also please let me know. Regards, Harkirat To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Dummynet - Burst Loss

guide me about this.. Regards, harkirat Singh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: RFC: SACK/FACK patch port to Current

so that user can use it at will. This facility will give the leverage to people who want to test the performance of TCP in the presence of NewReno, Sack and Fack. In my patch FACK will be used in combination with SACK! Regards, Harkirat Singh On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote: > &

Re: SACK is available in FreeBSD Release 4.3

sure what do you mean by -current version. Regards, Harkirat Singh On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > Before it can be checked in it has to go to -current. > > If you could make a -currnt version it would greatly increas the chance > that it can be integrated.. > >

SACK is available in FreeBSD Release 4.3

-hop ad-hoc network and it is working fine. Please have a look and let us know for any further clarification / information. Regards, Harkirat Singh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

TcpTrace filter option

Greetings! I have a querry about using tcptrace in wireless network. In sequence graphs I am getting many "hardware level dup acks". Tcptrace user manual describes filtering option to avoid "hardware level dup acks". I use following command (which gives error message) : ~/tcptrace -f

Re: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement

this take care of loss? I feel that there must be some tool which I am not aware of. Regards, Harkirat On Sat, 26 May 2001, Justin C.Walker wrote: > > On Saturday, May 26, 2001, at 12:24 PM, Harkirat Singh wrote: > > > > > I specifically want to see the performance of

Re: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement tool

I am looking at performance of UDT and TCP in same network condition!! -Harkirat On Sat, 26 May 2001, Bill Moran wrote: > Harkirat Singh wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool > > which tests

Re: UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement

I specifically want to see the performance of UDP in lossy channel, I am sure there must be some tool to measure it, I doing a kind of study and want to analyse TCP vs. UDP! -Harkirat On Sat, 26 May 2001, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Saturday 26 May 2001 13:51, Harkirat Singh wrote: > &

UDP - Reliable throughput mesaurement tool

Hello! I want to measure UDP thruput of lossy channel, is there any tool which tests it? I looked at some of the tools but these do not take care of loss, I mean no retransmisson, just measure raw thruput of UDP (TTCP is one of these). I am looking for a measurement tool which should re

TCP timers - callout

umentation about functionality of callout macros as Stevens Volume II does'nt have much of the details about it. Thanks, Harkirat Singh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Re: TTCP, Netperf and TcpBlast Problem

under /usr/ports then agian it is getting aborted. Thanks, Harkirat On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:29:05AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote: > > >=20 > > > This is the script fil

Re: TTCP, Netperf and TcpBlast Problem

/netperf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/benchmarks/netperf. penguin# exit exit Script done on Mon Apr 30 11:27:13 2001 ** On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:55:48AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote: > > I understand that netperf-2.1p13 doe

Re: TTCP, Netperf and TcpBlast Problem

SD. Do you know any other version of netperf which works with FreeBSD. Thanks, harkirat On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:50:16AM -0700, Harkirat Singh wrote: > > Then I thought that let me use Netperf, I went the ftp site as mentioned > > in the

TTCP, Netperf and TcpBlast Problem

se-4.2, if then please advise me from where can I get source code for Netperf and Tcpblast. Thanks, Harkirat Singh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) FBSD 3.2

Hello Friends: I want to know about implementation and support of ECN in TCP/IP stack of FreeBSD, is it a standard? Specifically to FreeBSD 3.2 I looked at netinet but could not find any thing related to it. Do I need to get some patch for ECN. I looked at RFC 2481 and it says that ECN

Mobile Network

very t sec I want to change route to D, means route from A to C would be as A -> D -> C not A -> B -> C. I want to know as how can I do this automatically. Any advise will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Harkirat Singh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "un