Re: igb(4) watchdog timeout, lagg(4) fails

Bezüglich Harald Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 20.02.2015 14:17 (localtime): (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-February/081810.html) > Bezüglich Harald Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 11.02.2015 20:48 > (localtime): >> Bezüglich Jack Vogel's Nachricht vom 11.02.2015 18:31 (loc

Re: Deleting IPv4 iface-routes from extra FIBs

Bezüglich Alexander V. Chernikov's Nachricht vom 13.10.2014 11:21 (localtime): > On 13.10.2014 13:16, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Alexander V. Chernikov's Nachricht vom 13.10.2014 10:42 >> (localtime): >>> On 13.10.2014 12:35, Harald Schmalzbau

Re: Deleting IPv4 iface-routes from extra FIBs

Bezüglich Alexander V. Chernikov's Nachricht vom 13.10.2014 10:42 (localtime): > On 13.10.2014 12:35, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 23.04.2014 09:55 >> (localtime): ... >>> yes, we made two behaviours. >>> Add

Re: Deleting IPv4 iface-routes from extra FIBs

Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 23.04.2014 09:55 (localtime): > On 4/23/14, 4:38 AM, Nikolay Denev wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> here, http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?vi

Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendmsg(2))

Bezüglich Yuri's Nachricht vom 02.09.2013 06:54 (localtime): > Please check in this patch: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181741 > Please MFC into 9.X > > Description of the problem is within PR. > > Thanks, > Yuri Hello, I guess this fix should make it into 10.1. Can someone check

Deleting IPv4 iface-routes from extra FIBs

Hello, here, http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=248895 interface route protection was added (so the following problem arose with 9.2). Unfortunately, in my case, I must be able to delete these routes; not in the default FIB, but in jail's fibs, because: · Host is multihomed wit

Re: [patch] permit fib to be set on interface

schrieb Alexander V. Chernikov am 08.05.2011 15:09 (localtime): > At the moment the only possible way to set packet fib from userland is > ipfw(8) setfib rule. Since no 'setfib tablearg' exists ruleset grows > with every fib. > Additionally, there is no way to set packet fib before netgraph > proc

Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 29.08.2012 12:18 (localtime): > schrieb Pete French am 29.08.2012 11:38 (localtime): >>> Link aggregation can never work with two separate switches! LACP and >>> static trunking require both sides to bundle the same trunk. which is >>&g

Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

schrieb Pete French am 29.08.2012 11:38 (localtime): >> Link aggregation can never work with two separate switches! LACP and >> static trunking require both sides to bundle the same trunk. which is >> impossible for two separate switches. > These switches had a port where you could connect them to

Re: Problem with link aggregation + sshd

schrieb Pete French am 28.08.2012 11:48 (localtime): >> No answer, so it seems that link aggregation doesn't really work in freebsd, >> this may help others with the same problem... > I used to use LCAP a lot - this was a few years ago, but the critical > point was that it only worked if all the c

Re: nVidia chipset - ethernet support?

Am Sonntag, 28. März 2004 23:57 schrieb Brian Candler: > I have installed FreeBSD-5.2.1 on my brand new Soltek EQ3702A machine, > which has an nVidia chipset. I have got most of the on-board hardware to > work: kldload snd_ich -- pcm > kldload firewire \ to mount my ipod > kldload sbp / >